INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SCIENCE EDUCATION
Research Article

Citizen Science as a Pedagogical Tool in Chemistry Education: Students’ Attitudes and Teachers’ Perceptions

Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2022, 18(2), e2271, https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11841
Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The need of promoting the affective dimension of chemistry literacy in students, through expressions of interest in chemistry-related topics and positive attitudes toward this field, has been emphasized in chemistry education. Thus, the purpose of this study was to understand students’ attitudes toward chemistry between the ages of 12 and 14, as well as how their participation in a citizen science project called Perceiving the Value of Chemistry behind water and microplastics (PVC) contributed to possible attitude changes. Although the research focus was chemistry education, chemistry and physics are taught as part of one subject in Portugal, so the attitudes towards physics and chemistry scale was used as a pre- and post-test. The pre-test showed positive attitudes towards physics and chemistry. In the post-test, the control group exhibited significantly negative changes in attitude, in all dimensions; whereas the experimental group revealed no significant changes. Pedagogical dynamics also affect students’ attitudes toward chemistry, so we undertook interviews to investigate the project’s impact on the pedagogical practices of the nine participating teachers. The results suggest that activities developed within the PVC project were formative for the teachers, allowing them to reflect on their practices and promoting an interdisciplinary approach to the topics addressed, in addition to enabling students to use knowledge in different and new perspectives. Moreover, through the development of pedagogical resources and training within this project, teachers recognized that they would continue this experience.

KEYWORDS

attitudes towards physics and chemistry chemical literacy teaching practices citizen science educational projects

CITATION (APA)

Araújo, J. L., Morais, C., & Paiva, J. C. (2022). Citizen Science as a Pedagogical Tool in Chemistry Education: Students’ Attitudes and Teachers’ Perceptions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(2), e2271. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11841
Harvard
Araújo, J. L., Morais, C., and Paiva, J. C. (2022). Citizen Science as a Pedagogical Tool in Chemistry Education: Students’ Attitudes and Teachers’ Perceptions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(2), e2271. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11841
Vancouver
Araújo JL, Morais C, Paiva JC. Citizen Science as a Pedagogical Tool in Chemistry Education: Students’ Attitudes and Teachers’ Perceptions. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(2):e2271. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11841
AMA
Araújo JL, Morais C, Paiva JC. Citizen Science as a Pedagogical Tool in Chemistry Education: Students’ Attitudes and Teachers’ Perceptions. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(2), e2271. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11841
Chicago
Araújo, José Luís, Carla Morais, and João Carlos Paiva. "Citizen Science as a Pedagogical Tool in Chemistry Education: Students’ Attitudes and Teachers’ Perceptions". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2022 18 no. 2 (2022): e2271. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11841
MLA
Araújo, José Luís et al. "Citizen Science as a Pedagogical Tool in Chemistry Education: Students’ Attitudes and Teachers’ Perceptions". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 18, no. 2, 2022, e2271. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11841

REFERENCES

  1. Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., Molen, J. H. W., & Asma, L. J. (2012). Primary teachers’ attitudes toward science: A new theoretical framework. Science Education, 96(1), 158-182. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20467
  2. Aikenhead, G. S. (2003). Chemistry and physics instruction: Integration, ideologies, and choices. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 4(2), 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1039/B2RP90041F
  3. Altundag, C. K., & Alkan, F. (2018). The effect of context-based learning on the attitude towards the daily life chemistry. Uluslararası Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi [International Journal of Scientific Research], 38-44. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.423559
  4. Araújo, J. L., Morais, C., & Paiva, J. C. (2020). Developing and implementing a low-cost, portable pedagogical kit to foster students’ water quality awareness and engagement by sampling coastal waters and analyzing physicochemical properties. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3697-3701. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00333
  5. Araújo, J. L., Morais, C., & Paiva, J. C. (2021). Student participation in a coastal water quality citizen science project and its contribution to the conceptual and procedural learning of chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RP00190F
  6. Ballard, H. L., Dixon, C. G. H., & Harris, E. M. (2017). Youth-focused citizen science: Examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation. Biological Conservation, 208, 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.024
  7. Bellocchi, A., King, D. T., & Ritchie, S. M. (2016). Context-based assessment: Creating opportunities for resonance between classroom fields and societal fields. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1304-1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1189107
  8. Bonn, A., Hecker, S., Bowser, A., Makuch, Z., Vogel, J., & Haklay, M. (2018). Citizen science to foster innovation in open science, society and policy. In S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, & A. Bonn (Eds.), Citizen science: Innovation in open science, society and policy (pp. 465-484). UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.38
  9. Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54(1), 106-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x
  10. Cardellini, L. (2012). Chemistry: Why the subject is difficult? Educación Química [Chemical Education], 23, 305-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(17)30158-1
  11. Cavas, P. H., Ozdem, Y., Cavas, B., Cakiroglu, J., & Ertepinar, H. (2013). Turkish pre-service elementary science teachers’ scientific literacy level and attitudes toward sience. Science Education International, 24(4), 383-401.
  12. Chang, R., & Goldsby, K. (2014). Chemistry. McGraw-Hill Education.
  13. Chang, S. N., & Chiu, M. H. (2005). The development of authentic assessments to investigate ninth graders’ scientific literacy: In the case of scientific cognition concerning the concepts of chemistry and physics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-5239-0
  14. Cheung, D. (2009). Students’ attitudes toward chemistry lessons: The interaction effect between grade level and gender. Research in Science Education, 39(1), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9075-4
  15. Cheung, D. (2011). Evaluating student attitudes toward chemistry lessons to enhance teaching in the secondary school. Educación Química [Chemical Education], 22(2), 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(18)30123-X
  16. Coll, R. K., Ali, S., Bonato, J., & Rohindra, D. (2006). Investigating first-year chemistry learning difficulties in the South Pacific: A case study from Fiji. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 365-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-9007-6
  17. Costello, A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
  18. Dalgety, J., Coll, R. K., & Jones, A. (2003). Development of chemistry attitudes and experiences questionnaire (CAEQ). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 649-668. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10103
  19. Dawson, V., & Carson, K. (2017). Using climate change scenarios to assess high school students’ argumentation skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1174932
  20. Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Wadsworth group/Thomson Learning.
  21. European Citizen Science Association. (2020). ECSA’s characteristics of citizen science. ECSA, 1-6.
  22. European Commission. (2014). Special eurobarometer 416 “Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment”. Directorate-General for Communication.
  23. Fernandes, C. A. F. (2007). A matemática na disciplina de ciências físico-quimicas: um estudo sobre as atitudes de alunos do 9° ano de escolaridade [Mathematics in the discipline of physical and chemical sciences: A study on the attitudes of students in the 9th-year of schooling] [Master’s thesis, Universidade do Minho].
  24. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE.
  25. Follett, R., & Strezov, V. (2015). An analysis of citizen science based research: Usage and publication patterns. PLOS ONE, 10(11), e0143687, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143687
  26. Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (Eds.). (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8
  27. Hansson, L., Hansson, Ö., Juter, K., & Redfors, A. (2021). Curriculum emphases, mathematics and teaching practices: Swedish upper-secondary physics teachers’ views. International Journal of Science and Mathmatics Education 19, 499-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10078-6
  28. Harlin, J., Kloetzer, L., Patton, D., Leonhard, C., & Students. (2018). Turning students into citizen scientists. In S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, & A. Bonn (Eds.), Citizen science: Innovation in open science, society and policy (pp. 410-428). UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.35
  29. Hecker, S., Garbe, L., & Bonn, A. (2018). The European citizen science landscape–a snapshot. In S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, & A. Bonn (Eds.), Citizen science: Innovation in open science, society and policy (pp. 190-200). UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.20
  30. Heng, C. K., & Karpudewan, M. (2015). The interaction effects of gender and grade level on secondary school students’ attitude towards learning chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(4), 889-898. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1446a
  31. Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2011). High-school students’ attitudes toward and interest in learning chemistry. Educación Química [Chemical Education], 22(2), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(18)30121-6
  32. Hofstein, A., Ben-Zvi, R., Damuel, D., & Tamir P. (1977). Attitudes of Israeli high school students toward chemistry and physics: A comparitive study. Science Education, 61, 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730610217
  33. Ibrahim, N. H. B., & Iksan, Z. B. (2018). Level of chemophobia and relationship with attitude towards chemistry among science students. Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 52-65. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.2.2.p.52-65
  34. IGEC, Inspeção-Geral da Educação e Ciência. (2019). Gestão do currículo: Ensino experimental das ciências. Relatório: Escola secundária de estarreja [Curriculum management: Experimental sciences education report, of the general inspectorate of education and sciences: Estarreja secondary school]. Inspeção-Geral da Educação e Ciência [General Inspection of Education and Science] (IGEC).
  35. Kaiser. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
  36. Kelemen-Finan, J., Scheuch, M., & Winter, S. (2018). Contributions from citizen science to science education: An examination of a biodiversity citizen science project with schools in Central Europe. International Journal of Science Education, 40(17), 2078-2098. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1520405
  37. Kohen, Z., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2020). How to promote chemical literacy? On-line question posing and communicating with scientists. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 250-266. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00134D
  38. Lu, Y.-Y., Chen, H.-T., Hong, Z.-R., & Yore, L. D. (2016). Students’ awareness of science teachers’ leadership, attitudes toward science, and positive thinking, International Journal of Science Education, 38(13), 2174-2196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1230792
  39. Motion, A. (2019). What can citizen science do for us? Chemistry world. https://www.chemistryworld.com/opinion/what-can-citizen-science-do-for-us/3010269.article
  40. Neto, A., Candeias, A. A., Rebelo, N., Varelas, D., & Diniz, A. M. (2013). Validade estrutural do questionário de atitudes face às ciências físico-químicas: Estudo com alunos do 9° ano ensino básico português [Structural validity of the attitudes towards physical and chemical sciences questionnaire: A study with 9th grade Portuguese primary school students]. In XII Congresso Internacional Galego-Português de Psicopedagogia [XII Galician-Portuguese International Congress of Psychopedagogy]. Universidade Minho, Braga, Portugal.
  41. Neto, A., Candeias, A., Pomar, C., Costa, P., Oliveira, M., Silva, S., Silva, J., & Rebelo, N. (2011). Questionários de atitudes face às ciências físico-químicas (QAFCFQ) em alunos portugueses do ensino básico: Estudo psicométrico [Attitudes towards physical and chemical sciences questionnaire (ATPCSQ) in Portuguese primary school students: Psychometric study]. In XI Congreso Internacional Galego-Portugués de Psicopedagoxía [XI International Galician-Portuguese Congress of Psychopedagogy]. Universidade da Corunha, Corunha, Espanha.
  42. Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and parents’ views of the school science curriculum: A study funded by the Wellcome Trust. King’s College, London.
  43. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
  44. Pires, H. S., Candeias, A. A., Grácio, L., Galindo, E., & Melo, M. (2017). The influence of family support according to gender in the Portuguese language course achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1064), 90-97. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01610
  45. Ruiz-Mallén, I., Riboli-Sasco, L., Ribrault, C., Heras, M., Laguna, D., & Perié, L. (2016). Citizen science: Toward transformative learning. Science Communication, 38(4), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016642241
  46. Salta, K. & Tzougraki, C. (2004). Attitudes toward chemistry among 11th grade students in high schools in Greece. Science Education, 88(4), 535-547. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10134
  47. Scheuch, M., Panhuber, T., Winter, S., Kelemen-Finan, J., Bardy-Durchhalter, M., & Kapelari, S. (2018). Butterflies & wild bees: Biology teachers’ PCK development through citizen science. Journal of Biological Education, 52(1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1405530
  48. Sharpe, R., & Abrahams, I. (2020). Secondary school students’ attitudes to practical work in biology, chemistry and physics in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 84-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1597696
  49. Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203-225. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90011A
  50. Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(39), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1
  51. Strasser, B., Baudry, J., Mahr, D., Sanchez, G., & Tancoigne, E. (2019). “Citizen science”? Rethinking science and public participation. Science & Technology Studies, 32(2), 52-76. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.60425
  52. Straub, M. C. P. (2020). A study of student responses to participation in online citizen science projects. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 869-886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10001-8
  53. Taber, K. S. (2016). Learning generic skills through chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17, 225-228. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp90003h
  54. Talanquer, V., & Sevian, H. (2014). Chemistry in past and new science frameworks and standards: Gains, losses, and missed opportunities. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(1), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400134c
  55. Tulloch, A. I. T., Possingham, H. P., Joseph, L. N., Szabo, J., & Martin, T. G. (2013). Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs. Biological Conservation, 165, 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.025
  56. Tytler, R., & Osborne, J. (2012). Student attitudes and aspirations towards science. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_41
  57. Vilia, P. N., Candeias, A. A., Neto, A. S., Franco, M. S., & Melo, M. (2017). Academic achievement in physics-chemistry: The predictive effect of attitudes and reasoning abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 81-89. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01064
  58. Vilia, P., & Candeias, A. A. (2020). Attitude towards the discipline of physics-chemistry and school achievement: revisiting factor structure to assess gender differences in Portuguese high-school students. International Journal of Science Education, 42(1), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1706012

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.