Abstract
This study explores the efficacy of distance education in fostering environmental awareness among preschool-aged students through the implementation of an educational game. The research investigates preschool educators’ perceptions and attitudes towards distance education, the potential for developing environmental consciousness through this medium, and the impact of a specifically designed teaching tool on students’ environmental awareness. Employing semi-structured interviews with nine Greek kindergarten teachers, the study examines the educators’ experiences following the implementation of the educational game via video-conferencing over a three-week period. Results indicate a generally positive reception among educators toward distance learning, noting its potential for cultivating environmental awareness from a young age. Despite challenges such as parental connectivity issues and internet disruptions, both educators and students adapted seamlessly to the remote learning environment. Educators observed active student engagement and heightened environmental awareness post-game implementation, suggesting the effectiveness of distance education coupled with interactive educational tools in facilitating environmental education.
License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article Type: Research Article
INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED, Volume 20, Issue 3, 2024, Article No: e2411
https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/14656
Publication date: 01 Jul 2024
Online publication date: 30 May 2024
Article Views: 837
Article Downloads: 403
Open Access HTML Content Download XML References How to cite this articleHTML Content
INTRODUCTION
The increase in environmental impacts caused by humans has raised significant concern among scientists (Nagra, 2010; Shende et al., 2015). To mitigate environmental issues, fostering a proactive attitude toward the environment is imperative for modern citizens. Developing environmental awareness, promoting responsible consumption habits, and embracing eco-friendly and recyclable products are crucial steps in addressing environmental challenges (Ari & Yilmaz, 2017; Panizzut et al., 2021). Environmental education plays a pivotal role in cultivating this mindset. Implementing comprehensive environmental education programs, starting from early childhood and including preschool, is essential for nurturing environmentally conscious individuals (Anbalagan & Rupali, 2015; Flogaitis et al., 2005; Papanikolaou et al., 2021).
The early years are recognized as a critical period for laying the foundation of environmental awareness, aiming to sensitize children and cultivate a positive and environmentally friendly attitude (Gontas et al., 2020; Russo, 2001; Tsekos et al., 2012). Guven and Yilmaz (2017) highlight the significance of the preschool age, as children undergo crucial developmental milestones encompassing motor skills, cognitive abilities, social-emotional development, and language skills. Research suggests that exposure to quality environmental education during early childhood can contribute to enhanced environmental consciousness across their lifespan (Campbell et al., 2002).
Theoretical Framework
One of the most significant global challenges is environmental pollution. Addressing this issue requires changes in people’s behavior and attitudes (Finch et al., 2016). Problems arise from the ongoing conflicts between humans and nature, primarily due to insufficient environmental education during people’s school years (Gontas et al., 2021; Konur & Akyol, 2017). According to the work of Yuce and Onel, (2018), developing ecological awareness in individuals requires ongoing education. It is essential to improve how we interact with the environment to create a sensitive society. This can be achieved through environmental education for students, ensuring a healthier environment in the coming years (Konur & Akyol, 2017). Education should provide the necessary knowledge and take care of the development of critical thinking of future citizens (Gavrilas et al., 2022).
Therefore, it is vital to implement environmental education not only from the early years of students’ schooling but also throughout their school years to sensitize them to and instill respect for the environment (Tsekos et al., 2012). Research by Lubomira (2004) and Palmer (1995) has shown that environmental education helps early-age students develop a positive attitude toward the environment. According to Yuce and Onel (2018), individuals who have gained environmental awareness from a young age tend to care for, protect, and maintain a friendly disposition towards the environment.
For the effective education of students in the development of environmental awareness, educators play a significant role (Gavrilas & Kotsis, 2023a; Tuncer et al., 2009). Educators should possess the appropriate knowledge and a friendly attitude toward the environment to teach and sensitize their students (Gontas et al., 2020; Oncu & Unluer, 2015; Papanikolaou et al., 2023). Educators can enhance students’ environmental awareness only when they have fundamental ecological knowledge and the right experience to achieve specific educational objectives (Desjean-Perrotta et al., 2008; Kotsis, 2023; Vlachos et al., 2024). Moreover, educators must teach environmental topics from the early years of students’ lives. In doing so, even from preschool age, educators can ensure the development of environmental awareness in students to acquire a positive attitude and behavior toward the environment (Lubomira, 2004).
A school with the educational goal of promoting and enhancing students’ environmental awareness fosters a relationship between students and the natural world (Hadzigeorgiou & Skoumios, 2013). According to Konur and Akyol (2017), the promotion of environmental education can commence within the student’s family and further develop within the school community during preschool years. Children become sensitized through action, play, and active engagement with their environment (Jeronen et al., 2009). In addition to experiential activities conducted in the school environment, students can be sensitized through distance education. Distance education is a novel teaching method applicable both inside and outside the classroom, where the educator’s role becomes more advisory. Distance learning has garnered significant interest among educators and students alike (Lai & Hwang, 2014).
The utilization of distance education holds the potential to bring about differentiation and significant changes to the educational landscape (Vrasidas & Glass, 2002). Distance learning can enrich the learning process and cultivate students’ skills (Henderson & Yeow, 2012; Papadakis, 2016), serving as a versatile tool for educators and students to access diverse educational programs and activities (Haleem et al., 2022).
Through distance education, educators can tailor teaching methods and materials to suit the individual needs of each student, thereby enhancing teaching efforts to address their weaknesses. Students, in turn, can gain additional knowledge as they engage with educational programs utilizing information and communication technology (ICT), making distance education a crucial tool for knowledge transmission and information exchange (Anbalagan & Rupali, 2015; Burns, 2023). Additionally, it’s important to recognize that informal learning experiences outside the classroom environment can benefit students of all ages, including preschool-age children (Kalogiannakis & Papadakis, 2017).
Through electronic learning, students can comprehend and become aware of environmental issues (Anbalagan & Rupali, 2015; Kalogiannakis & Papadakis, 2017). Preschool-age students can participate in an environmental program that enhances environmental awareness through distance education (Anbalagan & Rupali, 2015). Distance learning can serve as a means of teaching and promoting environmental issues (Caetano et al., 2018). Research has shown that electronic learning plays a significant role in environmental education, as preschool-age students become sensitized and improve their cognitive development, creativity, and autonomy (Ardoin & Bowers, 2020). Interactive games enable students to understand environmental problems (Pereira et al., 2020). Furthermore, electronic learning with interactive games is more effective and engaging (Panyajamorn et al., 2018). When implementing electronic learning during the preschool age, it is essential to select interesting and enjoyable activities that capture students’ interest. In the context of environmental education, educators play a vital role in designing activities that allow students to have an active role (Konur & Akyol, 2017).
Improving education, particularly with a focus on integrating technology into the educational process, is essential (Graham et al., 2009). Educators should actively utilize technology within the classroom (Gavrilas et al., 2024a). However, some educators are not familiar with the use of new technologies and struggle to integrate them properly into their teaching methods (Gavrilas et al., 2020). To address this issue, the development of technological pedagogical content knowledge framework was significant (Mishra & Koehler, 2006).
Environmental education in preschool age can greatly benefit from educational games, serving as a powerful tool for educators (Siko & Barbour, 2012). These games enhance problem-solving skills and foster creativity in preschool children (Siko & Barbour, 2012). They also provide experiences that traditional teaching methods may not achieve (Kebritchi & Hirumi, 2008), especially when addressing environmental issues that a student may not have direct access to or experiences with.
Research by Betrus and Botturi (2010) indicates that games developed using Microsoft Office PowerPoint software can significantly increase student motivation, provide valuable feedback, and promote self-regulation and self-improvement. Additionally, these games can seamlessly integrate into preschool education, even as a component of distance learning, leveraging the accessibility and user-friendly interface of PowerPoint. This contributes to user-friendly interaction for both students and educators, some of whom, as mentioned earlier, may exhibit resistance to new technologies. They can easily create their own games with basic computer literacy skills or adapt them according to educational objectives and student needs. In this particular study, the games created with PowerPoint, as we will discuss later, are related to environmental issues.
Research Questions
Teachers, serving as facilitators of learning, hold a pivotal position in transforming knowledge into compelling and comprehensible lessons (Kotsis et al., 2023; Slavit et al., 2016). Through documenting their perspectives, educational institutions can acquire invaluable understanding of the obstacles and achievements in integrating technology, thereby enabling refinement of curricula and teaching methodologies (Gavrilas & Kotsis, 2024; Margot & Kettler, 2019). This study aimed to investigate perceptions and attitudes of preschool educators following implementation of a teaching tool through distance education to raise awareness and develop environmental consciousness in students aged four to six years. The research questions of the study are, as follows:
-
What are educators’ views regarding the application of distance education in the preschool age?
-
Is it possible to develop environmental consciousness through distance education in preschool-age students?
-
Did the implementation of the teaching tool (game) enhance the development of environmental awareness in preschool-age students?
METHODOLOGY
Teaching Proposal
The researchers of this study developed a teaching tool (game) aimed at raising awareness among preschool-age students about environmental issues through distance education, in accordance with Prensky’s (2001, 2003) model. Prensky’s (2001, 2003) model, which delineates the requisite levels of learning a game must facilitate for players to attain predefined objectives, served as a guiding framework throughout the design phase. To create the teaching tool, images were obtained from the internet and appropriately modified and processed to meet the needs of the game. The game was constructed using PowerPoint 2007 software, adhering to principles governing games (digital or non-digital), including their structure and organization (objectives, purpose, rules, difficulty, challenge, imagination, constraints, instructions, choices, safety) (Alessi & Trollip, 2001). The educational game was presented to three educators prior to the conduct of the research, who suggested modifications, where necessary. Subsequently, was provided to the educators participating in the research, who also had the option to modify it if necessary, in accordance with the educational needs of their students.
Brief Description of Educational Game
The following provides a brief description of the educational game designed for preschool-age students, aiming to introduce them to environmental issues in a playful manner. Specifically, the game aims to teach concepts related to marine pollution, soil pollution, deforestation, the extinction of animals, and the concept of recycling. The game offers three choices to the students (Figure 1): they can choose to play at the sea (Figure 2), in the city (Figure 3), or the forest (Figure 4). Within each option, students engage in problem-solving activities, select correct answers independently, or collaborate with their peers.
Application of Teaching Tool
The teaching tool was implemented remotely through the Zoom video-conferencing application. The duration of each lesson was 40 minutes, spanning three weeks. Due to the students’ young age and varying familiarity with using a computer mouse, the preschool teacher exclusively handled the game’s controls. She engaged with the students according to the game’s progression, prompting them to respond by collaborating to solve the presented problems. The objectives of the teaching tool are for students to
-
acquire environmental awareness and a friendly attitude towards the environment,
-
raise their awareness of environmental issues and learn about recycling,
-
understand concepts related to pollution and environmental destruction,
-
develop critical thinking skills, justify their thoughts, and find ways to address problems, and
-
interact and collaborate with their peers.
Research Method & Sample Selection
The research technique chosen for data collection was semi-structured interviews, incorporating open-ended questions. The study sample was opportunistic and comprised nine preschool educators from five different urban kindergartens in Greece (Table 1).
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of participants
|
Data Collection & Processing
The interviews were conducted with nine Greek preschool teachers, from five kindergarten schools, approximately one week after implementing the educational tool with the students. The interviews took place at the interviewee’s place of choice. The interviews were initially recorded and subsequently transcribed to obtain the research data. Data analysis was performed using qualitative data processing software, Nvivo 11.
Content analysis, as outlined in Table 2, was conducted to address the research questions of the study. It’s important to note that the interviews and interview transcripts were conducted in the Greek language. However, for the presentation of the results in this study, they have been translated into English for the convenience of the readers.
Table 2. Categories of analysis
|
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
Implementation of Distance Learning
The educators appeared to hold a positive attitude toward distance learning, except for one kindergarten teacher who expressed a less favorable view towards this type of education. Educators mentioned that it was their first time teaching remotely. In Figure 5, the frequency of words from the interview data analysis is observed. The words ‘children, experience, new, and teaching’ exhibit the highest frequency and play a significant role in assessing the results.
I4: ‘... a unique experience ... a new teaching method ... provides many opportunities in your teaching ... we maintained contact with the children.’
I7: ‘... no, I have not taught remotely in the past. It was the first time this year.’
The educators stated that there are both positive and negative aspects to implementing distance learning. It was observed that, based on the educators’ responses, the positive aspects outweigh the negative ones. One of the positives mentioned was that distance learning provides students with a new teaching method, while almost all educators cited the limited class time as a negative aspect.
I3: ‘... it finds resonance among various groups of learners ... it can provide opportunities for education to individuals living in isolated areas or facing mobility or health issues.’
I7: ‘... you offer new tools, new ideas, new learning ... you can capture students’ interest through audiovisual materials, using videos, stories, and images ...’
I2: ‘... there was no direct contact with the students...children had difficulty concentrating.’
I4: ‘... the class time was limited ... you could not engage in many activities with the children ...’
As for students’ attitude towards this type of teaching, all educators reported that most students had a positive attitude, with only a few appearing to be negative. In Figure 6, the frequency of words from interview data analysis is observed. The words ‘students, positive, and attitude’ exhibit the highest frequency and play a significant role in assessing the results.
I2: ‘Positive attitude. The students were quite enthusiastic ...’
I3: ‘Most students reacted enthusiastically ... only a few were initially negative.’
Challenges in Implementation of Distance Learning
The majority of educators appeared to face some difficulties during the lessons. More specifically, many educators mentioned the lack of consistency in parents connecting on time, and also internet disruptions as factors that made teaching challenging. In the following Figure 7, the frequency of words from the interview data analysis is observed. The words ‘difficulties, connections, sometimes, and time,’ and ‘parents’ exhibit the highest frequency and play a significant role in assessing the results.
I2: ‘... regarding network connectivity, there were several interruptions.’
I5: ‘... the lack of consistency in the timing of lessons on the part of parents and students, resulting in the loss of educational time ... some days, the signal happened to be weak ...’
Conversely, when it comes to the activities implemented by the educators, it appeared that neither the educators themselves nor the students faced difficulties adjusting the activities based on their needs.
I3: ‘... I tried to create activities that met the children’s requirements.’
I9: ‘... no, it did not pose a challenge for us because I tried to adapt our activities to make it easier for my students and myself and to make the lesson more enjoyable.’
Importance of Environmental Awareness
The educators consider the development of environmental awareness in preschool-aged students to be quite significant. In Figure 8, the frequency of words from the interview data analysis is observed. The words ‘important, learn, and age,’ and ‘young’ exhibit the highest frequency and play a significant role in assessing the results.
I3: ‘... children need to be sensitized to the environment from a young age ... from preschool age, children can develop environmental ethics and learn to respect the environment in which they live.’
According to educators, the development of environmental awareness can also occur at a young age. The majority of educators stated that students can become sensitized to environmental issues through both distance education and experiential activities.
In Figure 9, the frequency of words from the interview data analysis is observed. The words ‘can, distance, and children,’ and ‘experiential’ exhibit the highest frequency and play a significant role in assessing the results.
I5: ‘... it can be cultivated in younger children ... I consider engaging children in environmental issues from a young age important because it is the appropriate age for shaping social values, behavioral standards, and overall life attitudes ...’
I8: ‘... it can be developed at both ages ... we can achieve this through distance and in-person lessons ...’
Educators largely agree that new technologies and games can contribute to the development of environmental awareness. According to educators, through new technologies, they have access to various online stories, songs, and games that can capture students’ interest and help them playfully understand environmental concepts.
In Figure 10, the frequency of words from the interview data analysis is observed. The words ‘children, can, and games,’ and ‘new’ exhibit the highest frequency and play a significant role in assessing the results.
I5: ‘... I consider the use of the computer and a gamified approach to learning necessary ... especially for subjects like environmental topics, which are considered challenging for younger children ... after all, images, educational videos, and interactive games are tools that greatly help in maintaining the interest and attention of younger children ...’
Application of Educational Tool
Educators’ opinions regarding the educational tool they applied remotely were quite positive. According to the educators, they liked the game very much, considering it had nice images and colors, making it quite appealing to the students. All educators stated that it was comprehensible and engaging for the students. In Figure 11, the frequency of words from the interview data analysis is observed. The words ‘nice and game,’ and ‘liked children’ exhibited the highest frequency and played a significant role in assessing the results.
I1: ‘... I liked it very much ... nice images for children ... with nice examples and messages that children can understand through these images ... I found it very interesting for the children ...’
I4: ‘... I found it very interesting, quite appealing to the children ... I liked the images used; they were attractive to the children, and their structure was very well organized. It was a game that was special to me ...’
I4: ‘... it was quite comprehensible for my students ... its content was suitable for the children’s age ...’
I7: ‘... it captured their interest so much ...’
I9: ‘... my students were thrilled ... they showed that it drew their attention, and they actively participated ...’
The entirety of the educators stated that the game was quite easy to implement, causing no difficulties for either themselves or the students. Moreover, the educators reported that the students contemplated environmental issues during and after the game.
I1: ‘No, it was quite easy, neither I nor the children faced any issues ...’
I4: ‘... especially during the game ... the students showed intense contemplation ... upon completing the game, my students expressed numerous questions that, from what I understand, were provoked by this game ...’
With the application of the teaching tool, the educators reported that the students interacted throughout the game to solve the problems that arose. There was interaction through discussions with both the educator and their fellow students.
Figure 12 illustrates the frequency of appearance of words from the interview data analysis. The words ‘game, students, and interaction,’ and ‘solve’ exhibit the highest frequency and play a significant role in assessing the results.
I4: ‘... the students constantly interacted ... they communicated on how to solve the problems presented by the game ...’
I5: ‘... students exchanged opinions, relevant experiences; there were several moments when one helped or complemented the other, sometimes they agreed, and other times they disagreed, each putting forth their arguments ...’
The educators stated that the students comprehended environmental concepts to a great extent. All educators responded that their students became more environmentally aware after using the game. The game helped students understand, in a playful manner, the impacts of human activities on the environment. The frequency of words from the interview analysis results is presented in Figure 13. The words ‘understood,’ ‘concepts,’ and ‘recycling’ have the highest frequency and play a significant role in evaluating the outcomes.
I4: ‘... through a playful way, they comprehended concepts about the environment ... concepts that are easy and understandable for the children’s age ...’
I9: ‘They learned the meaning of protecting a word that has great importance for the environment ...’
I4: ‘This game positively contributed to sensitizing students remotely and fostering environmental awareness ...’
Regarding the assessment of students’ environmental awareness, most educators stated that they evaluated the students based on the discussions that took place during the lessons, as well as the discussions between students and parents. Figure 14 displays the frequency of words from the interview analysis results. The words ‘game,’ ‘environment,’ ‘think,’ and ‘students’ have the highest frequency and play a significant role in evaluating the outcomes.
I5: ‘... through their responses, the difference in students’ thinking regarding the environment and their sensitization became evident ... parents informed me about the environmental concerns and contemplations expressed by the children at home, various ideas and solutions that the students came up with concerning environmental issues ...’
I4: ‘... a student tells me, ‘Miss, I want when schools open again, all of us to go to a forest and collect garbage and take care of the forest ...’’
All educators stated that the students requested to play the game again, and some mentioned that the students asked to play other similar educational games. Some educators stated that parents wanted to have the game so that their children could play it again at another time outside of class. The educators did not seem to require any additional technical infrastructure since the PowerPoint program was already installed on their computers, which, in their opinion, makes it particularly user-friendly.
I6: ‘Yes, and we played it again. Parents asked me to send it to them so their children could play it at home on their own ...’
I4: ‘No ... PowerPoint was already installed on the computer, and in my opinion, it’s quite user-friendly.’
Most educators said they would not make any changes or improvements to the game, while some mentioned that they would like to add other thematic units. Finally, the educators seemed to have a positive attitude towards creating a similar game for implementation in their classroom or remotely. One educator pointed out that they would not create a new game if it required knowledge of another program.
I4: ‘I think not ... this game ... for me, it was ... I consider it suitable for the children’s age, and the content was also easy and understandable ... I would not make any changes.’
I6: ‘No, it was good ... simply, other stories could be added...’
I6: ‘Yes, it’s interesting ... the main thing is that it’s done in PowerPoint, which I generally know how to use, so maybe I’ll think about doing something similar at some point. If I had to learn another program, I would not consider making something similar.’
DISCUSSION
In the discussion of our findings, it is evident that the majority of educators demonstrated a favorable attitude toward distance learning, a trend also documented in the research by Plotka and Guirguis (2023). In the study by Bubb and Jones (2020), some preschool educators reported a reduction in their workload, allowing them to dedicate more attention to students. Notably, for most educators, this marked their initial venture into remote teaching. We observed that distance learning has both positive and negative aspects, while limited class time stands out as a significant drawback. Szente (2020) similarly found that teachers were comfortable with the operation of teleconferencing programs in their classrooms or homes and were able to share screens, use digital books, and online links for activities.
Regarding students’ attitudes towards this mode of instruction, all educators reported that the majority displayed a positive outlook, with only a few expressing negative sentiments. Many educators faced challenges during lessons, particularly inconsistencies in parents’ timely connectivity and internet disruptions, which complicated the teaching process. Dong et al. (2020) also reported that implementing online learning during the pandemic was problematic and challenging for preschool students’ families. Similar conclusions were reached by Hu et al. (2021), as they noted that implementing online learning for young students was problematic and challenging for families. However, concerning the activities implemented, both educators and students managed to adapt seamlessly to meet the students’ needs.
Educators collectively stressed the importance of instilling environmental awareness in preschool-aged students (Lamanauskas, 2023). They emphasized that such awareness can be cultivated from a young age, with the majority indicating that students can develop sensitivity to environmental issues through distance education and experiential activities. Educators widely agreed that new technologies and educational games can play a pivotal role in enhancing environmental awareness (Kabadayi & Altinsoy, 2018). They highlighted that these technologies provide access to online stories, songs, and games that capture students’ interest and facilitate their playful comprehension of environmental concepts (OECD, 2019a). Educators expressed predominantly positive opinions regarding the educational tools used remotely. They found the game visually appealing, with pleasing imagery and colors, and it was straightforward to implement, posing no significant challenges for either educators or students. Furthermore, students contemplated environmental issues during and after playing the game (Fjællingsdal & Klöckner, 2019). A positive aspect is that educators express willingness to utilize the new technology henceforth. Therefore, educational institutions responsible for training new educators, such as universities, should accordingly adapt their curricula, while educational bodies should provide high-quality training to in-service educators (Gavrilas et al., 2024b).
During the application of the teaching tool, educators observed active student interaction throughout the game, including discussions with educators and their peers. The educators noted that students displayed a significant understanding of environmental concepts, with all educators concurring that their students exhibited heightened environmental awareness after using the game, facilitating their understanding of the environmental impact of human activities in a playful manner. Regarding assessing students’ environmental awareness, most educators relied on evaluations based on discussions during lessons and interactions between students and parents (National Research Council, 2001; OECD, 2009b). All students desired to replay the game, with some requesting similar educational games. A few educators noted parental interest in providing access to the game for their children to play outside regular class hours. While most educators did not intend to make changes or improvements to the game, some expressed interest in adding other thematic units. Ultimately, the educators displayed a positive attitude toward the prospect of creating similar educational games for use in their classrooms or remotely, something that has also been recorded in another research (Jääskä & Aaltonen, 2022; Korkmaz et al., 2023; Xiong et al., 2022).
CONCLUSIONS
Following the literature review, the significance of implementing an environmental education program in preschool education was established to achieve the goals of sustainable development and sustainability. The development of an educational tool aimed at raising awareness and fostering environmental consciousness among preschool students and its application through distance education presented a challenge. The combination of distance education with suitable educational games offers new educational prospects. Educators with the right knowledge can successfully apply them in preschool education, allowing students to benefit from these new opportunities. In addition, modern education should provide the necessary knowledge to students but also take care of the development of the critical thinking of future citizens so that they can make the most appropriate decisions for their lives (Albanese & Paturas, 2018; Gavrilas & Kotsis, 2023b; Liu et al., 2021; Marin & Halpern, 2011).
Limitations
The generalizability of research findings can be limited when the sample does not represent the population of interest. Future studies could aim to include a more diverse larger sample of participants from different regions and educational specialties and backgrounds to improve the generalizability of research findings.
Author contributions: All authors have sufficiently contributed to the study and agreed with the results and conclusions.
Funding: No funding source is reported for this study.
Ethical statement: The authors stated the study did not require formal ethical approval. The authors further stated that the survey was anonymous; participants were all adults; anyone who did not want to participate verbally informed the researchers before receiving the questionnaire; and anyone who wished to stop participating during the research informed the researchers and stopped.
Declaration of interest: No conflict of interest is declared by the authors.
Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author.
References
- Albanese, J., & Paturas, J. (2018). The importance of critical thinking skills in disaster management. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, 11(4), 326-334.
- Alessi, S. M., Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development. Allyn and Bacon.
- Anbalagan, G., & Rupali, S. (2015). Developing environmental awareness through open and distance learning system. Journal of Distance & Online Learning, 1(1), 49-57.
- Ardoin, N. M., & Bowers, A. W. (2020). Early childhood environmental education: A systematic review of the research literature. Educational Research Review, 31, 100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100353
- Ari, E., & Yilmaz, V. (2017). Effects of environmental illiteracy and environmental awareness among middle school students on environmental behavior. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19(5), 1779-1793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9826-3
- Betrus, A., & Botturi, L. (2010). Principles of playing games for learning. In A. Hirumi (Ed.), Playing games in school: Video games and simulations for primary and secondary education. International Society for Technology in Education.
- Bubb, S., & Jones, M.-A. (2020). Learning from the COVID-19 home-schooling experience: Listening to pupils, parents/carers and teachers. Improving Schools, 23(3), 209-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480220958797
- Burns, M. (2023). Distance education for teacher training: Modes, models and methods. Education Development Center.
- Caetano, F. J. P., Oliveira, C. M. B. P., Araújo, M. F. F., & Rêgo, M. C. F. D. (2018). Towards climate change awareness through distance learning–Are young Portuguese and Brazilian university students vigilant? In U. M. Azeiteiro, W. Leal Filho, & L. Aires (Eds.), Climate literacy and innovations in climate change education: Distance learning for sustainable development (pp. 261-273). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70199-8_15
- Campbell, F. A., Ramey, C. T., Pungello, E., Sparling, J., & Miller-Johnson, S. (2002). Early childhood education: Young adult outcomes from the abecedarian project. Applied Developmental Science, 6(1), 42-57. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0601_05
- Desjean-Perrotta, B., Moseley, C., & Cantu, L. E. (2008). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of the environment: Does ethnicity or dominant residential experience matter? The Journal of Environmental Education, 39(2), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.39.2.21-32
- Dong, C., Cao, S., & Li, H. (2020). Young children’s online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105440
- Finch, K. C., Snook, K. R., Duke, C. H., Fu, K.-W., Tse, Z. T. H., Adhikari, A., & Fung, I. C.-H. (2016). Public health implications of social media use during natural disasters, environmental disasters, and other environmental concerns. Natural Hazards, 83(1), 729-760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2327-8
- Fjællingsdal, K. S., & Klöckner, C. A. (2019). Gaming green: The educational potential of eco–A digital simulated ecosystem. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2846. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02846
- Flogaitis, E., Daskolia, M., & Agelidou, E. (2005). Kindergarten teachers’ conceptions of environmental education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(3), 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-005-0039-x
- Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023a). Assessing elementary understanding of electromagnetic radiation and its implementation in wireless technologies among pre-service teachers. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 5(2), ep2309. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/13191
- Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023b). Research for self-reported health problems after excessive talking time on mobile phones among university students. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 3(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/12958
- Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2024). Investigating perceptions of primary and preschool educators regarding incorporation of educational robotics into STEM education. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 5(1), ep24003. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/14384
- Gavrilas, L., Kotsis, K. T., & Papanikolaou, M.-S. (2022). Attitudes and Behaviors of University Students Towards Electromagnetic Radiation of Cell Phones and Wireless Networks. Aquademia, 6(2), ep22009. https://doi.org/10.30935/aquademia/12393
- Gavrilas, L., Kotsis, K. T., & Papanikolaou, M.-S. (2024a). Assessing teacher readiness for educational robotics integration in primary and preschool education. Education 3-13, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2300699
- Gavrilas, L., Kotsis, K. T., & Papanikolaou, M.-S. (2024b). Exploration of the prospective utilization of educational robotics by preschool and primary education teachers. Pedagogical Research, 9(1), em0181. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14049
- Gavrilas, L., Plakitsi, K., & Kotsis K.T. (2020). Perceptions and attitudes of preschool and primary education teachers towards educational robotics and STEM. In K. Plakitsi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Panhellenic Conference, Sciences in Preschool Education: Mapping the New Twenty Years of Research and Teaching Practice (pp. 679-701). Ioannina, Greece.
- Gontas, P., Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2020). The impact of gender on university students’ perceptions about renewable energy sources. Science Teaching: Research and Praxis, 74-75, 9-24.
- Gontas, P., Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2021). Prospective teachers’ perceptions of renewable energy sources. Science and Technology Issues in Education, 14, 37-48.
- Graham, C., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L. S., Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0328-0
- Guven, S., & Yilmaz, N. (2017). Role and importance of family at preschool children environmental education. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(4), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2017.v6n4p105
- Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Skoumios, M. (2013). The development of environmental awareness through school science: Problems and possibilities. International Society of Educational Research, 8, 405-426.
- Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
- Henderson, S., & Yeow, J. (2012). Ipad in education: A case study of iPad adoption and use in a primary school. In Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 78-87). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.390
- Hu, X., Chiu, M. M., Leung, W. M. V., & Yelland, N. (2021). Technology integration for young children during COVID-19: Towards future online teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1513-1537. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13106
- Jääskä, E., & Aaltonen, K. (2022). Teachers’ experiences of using game-based learning methods in project management higher education. Project Leadership and Society, 3, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100041
- Jeronen, E., Jeronen, J., & Raustia, H. (2009). Environmental education in Finland–A case study of environmental education in nature schools. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(1), 1-23.
- Kabadayi, A., & Altinsoy, F. (2018). Traditional and technological methods for raising preschool children’s awareness of environmental pollution for sustainability. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 9(2), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2018-0020
- Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2017). Combining mobile technologies in environmental education: A Greek case study. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(2), 108-130. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2017.084272
- Kebritchi, M., & Hirumi, A. (2008). Examining the pedagogical foundations of modern educational computer games. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1729-1743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.004
- Konur, K. B., & Akyol, N. (2017). Preschool students’ perceptions on environmental problems. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(10), 2109-2119.
- Korkmaz, S., Cetin-Dindar, A., & Oner, F. K. (2023). Impact of educational game development on students’ achievement and attitudes toward science. The Journal of Educational Research, 116(5), 268-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2023.2265852
- Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Alternative ideas about concepts of physics, a timelessly valuable tool for physics education. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 3(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/13776
- Kotsis, K. T., Nikou, G., & Stylos, G. (2023). The readiness of preservice teachers for the distance education of physics in Greece. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(3), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.3.668
- Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). Effects of mobile learning time on students’ conception of collaboration, communication, complex problem-solving, meta-cognitive awareness, and creativity. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(3/4), 276. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2014.067029
- Lamanauskas, V. (2023). The importance of environmental education at an early age. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(4), 564-567. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.564
- Liu, Z., Li, S., Shang, S., & Ren, X. (2021). How do critical thinking ability and critical thinking disposition relate to the mental health of university students? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 704229. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704229
- Lubomira, D. (2004). Environmental education at pre-school. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 13(3), 258-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382040408668520
- Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10. 1186/s40594-018-0151-2
- Marin, L. M., & Halpern, D. F. (2011). Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Explicit instruction produces greatest gains. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.08.002
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
- Nagra, V. (2010). Environmental education awareness among school teachers. The Environmentalist, 30(2), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-010-9257-x
- National Research Council. (2001). Classroom assessment and the national science education standards. The National Academies Press.
- OECD. (2009a). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/43044074.pdf
- OECD. (2019b). Educating 21st century children: Emotional well-being in the digital age. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/b7f33425-en
- Oncu, E. C., & Unluer, E. (2015). Environmental views and awareness of preschool teacher candidates. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2653-2657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.948
- Palmer, J. A. (1995). Environmental thinking in the early years: Understanding and misunderstanding of concepts related to waste management. Environmental Education Research, 1(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462950010103
- Panizzut, N., Rafi-ul-Shan, P. M., Amar, H., Sher, F., Mazhar, M. U., & Klemeš, J. J. (2021). Exploring relationship between environmentalism and consumerism in a market economy society: A structured systematic literature review. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 2, 100047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100047
- Panyajamorn, T., Suanmali, S., Kohda, Y., Chongphaisal, P., & Supnithi, T. (2018). Effectiveness of e-learning design and affecting variables in Thai public schools. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2018.15.1.1
- Papadakis, S. (2016). Creativity and innovation in European education. Ten years eTwinning. Past, present, and the future. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(3/4), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2016.082315
- Papanikolaou, M.-S., Gavrilas, L. & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Enhancing pre-school students’ understanding of water pollution through educational intervention. In G. Stylos, & K. T. Kotsis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Panhellenic Conference on Education in Natural Sciences and Technology. https://doi.org/10.12681/codiste.5570
- Papanikolaou, M.-S., Plakitsi, K., Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2021). Investigating preschool students’ ideas for science concepts on understanding modern environmental problems. In I. Boikos, K. Stefanidou, K. Tsalapati, & K. Skordoulis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Panhellenic Conference on the Teaching of Natural Sciences and New Technologies in Education: “The Role of Science Education in 21st Century Society”. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33312.15369
- Pereira, R. C. S., Dinis, M. A. P., & Gouveia, L. B. (2020). The use of mobile devices in environmental education. In W. Leal Filho, U. Tortato, & F. Frankenberger (Eds.), Universities and sustainable communities: Meeting the goals of the agenda 2030 (pp. 643-649). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30306-8_38
- Plotka, R., & Guirguis, R. (2023). Distance learning in early childhood during the COVID-19 crisis: Family and educators’ experiences. Early Childhood Education Journal, 51(8), 1359-1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01384-5
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. McGraw-Hill.
- Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950596
- Russo, S. (2001). Promoting attitudes towards environmental education depends on early childhood education. Investigating, 17(4), 34-36.
- Shende, V. A., Janbandhu, K. S., & Patil, K. G. (2015). Impact of human beings on environment. Journal of Innovation in Sciences, 2(1), 23-28.
- Siko, J. P., & Barbour, M. K. (2012). Homemade PowerPoint games: Game design pedagogy aligned to the tpack framework. Computers in the Schools, 29(4), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2012.734430
- Slavit, D., Nelson, T. H., & Lesseig, K. (2016). The teachers’ role in developing, opening, and nurturing an inclusive STEM-focused school. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0040-5
- Szente, J. (2020). Live virtual sessions with toddlers and preschoolers amid COVID-19: Implications for early childhood teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 373-380.
- Tsekos, C. A., Christoforidou, E. I., & Tsekos, E. A. (2012). Planning an environmental education project for kindergarten under the theme of “the forest”. Review of European Studies, 4(2), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v4n2p111
How to cite this article
APA
Gavrilas, L., Papanikolaou, M.-S., & Kotsis, K. T. (2024). The views of preschool educators on the development of environmental awareness through distance education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 20(3), e2411. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/14656
Vancouver
Gavrilas L, Papanikolaou MS, Kotsis KT. The views of preschool educators on the development of environmental awareness through distance education. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2024;20(3):e2411. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/14656
AMA
Gavrilas L, Papanikolaou MS, Kotsis KT. The views of preschool educators on the development of environmental awareness through distance education. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2024;20(3), e2411. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/14656
Chicago
Gavrilas, Leonidas, Marianna-Sotiria Papanikolaou, and Konstantinos T. Kotsis. "The views of preschool educators on the development of environmental awareness through distance education". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2024 20 no. 3 (2024): e2411. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/14656
Harvard
Gavrilas, L., Papanikolaou, M.-S., and Kotsis, K. T. (2024). The views of preschool educators on the development of environmental awareness through distance education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 20(3), e2411. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/14656
MLA
Gavrilas, Leonidas et al. "The views of preschool educators on the development of environmental awareness through distance education". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 20, no. 3, 2024, e2411. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/14656