Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education

The Use of The Lesser Kestrel’s Life Cycle to Enhance Elementary School Children’s Understanding of Complex Systems
Adiv Gal 1 * , Dafna Gan 2 * , Orit Ben Zvi – Assaraf 3 *
More Detail
1 Israeli Institute for Environmental and Sustainability Education, Kibbutzim College of Education Technology and the Arts, ISRAEL
2 The Israeli Institute for Environmental and Sustainability Education, Kibbutzim College of Education Technology and the Arts, Israel
3 Department of Science and Technology Education, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
* Corresponding Author
Research Article

Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2021 - Volume 17 Issue 1, Article No: e2226
https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/9152

Published Online: 10 Nov 2020

Views: 234 | Downloads: 73

How to cite this article
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Gal et al., 2021)
Reference: Gal, A., Gan, D., & Ben Zvi – Assaraf, O. (2021). The Use of The Lesser Kestrel’s Life Cycle to Enhance Elementary School Children’s Understanding of Complex Systems. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(1), e2226. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/9152
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Gal A, Gan D, Ben Zvi – Assaraf O. The Use of The Lesser Kestrel’s Life Cycle to Enhance Elementary School Children’s Understanding of Complex Systems. Int J Env Sci Ed. 2021;17(1):e2226. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/9152
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Gal A, Gan D, Ben Zvi – Assaraf O. The Use of The Lesser Kestrel’s Life Cycle to Enhance Elementary School Children’s Understanding of Complex Systems. Int J Env Sci Ed. 2021;17(1), e2226. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/9152
Chicago
In-text citation: (Gal et al., 2021)
Reference: Gal, Adiv, Dafna Gan, and Orit Ben Zvi – Assaraf. "The Use of The Lesser Kestrel’s Life Cycle to Enhance Elementary School Children’s Understanding of Complex Systems". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2021 17 no. 1 (2021): e2226. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/9152
Harvard
In-text citation: (Gal et al., 2021)
Reference: Gal, A., Gan, D., and Ben Zvi – Assaraf, O. (2021). The Use of The Lesser Kestrel’s Life Cycle to Enhance Elementary School Children’s Understanding of Complex Systems. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(1), e2226. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/9152
MLA
In-text citation: (Gal et al., 2021)
Reference: Gal, Adiv et al. "The Use of The Lesser Kestrel’s Life Cycle to Enhance Elementary School Children’s Understanding of Complex Systems". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 17, no. 1, 2021, e2226. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/9152
ABSTRACT
Understanding the complexity of ecological system is crucial if one is to achieve a proper understanding of what they are and how they function. This study followed an environmental education program designed to introduce fifth grade students from a highly rural community to the world of ornithology and to the importance of maintaining the biodiversity of birds in nature. Its goal was to explore the program’s influence on the development of these students’ system thinking skills in the context of the life-cycle of the Lesser Kestrel (LK). Students’ perceptions of system complexity were tracked using the repertory grid technique, which takes the form of a highly structured interview in which constructs represent participants’ interpretations of various elements and the relationships between them. The results indicate that these fifth graders developed a significantly complex view of the LK’s ecosystem. Participation in the program developed the ability of some of the students to generalize and to identify changes that occurred in the birds’ ecosystem over time. Design elements such as longitudinal real-time observations and learning about the kestrel’s life-cycle while examining its interaction with its environment were found to be important for system thinking development. These cognitive tools may enable students to better cope with complex, biodiversity-related environmental issues in the future.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
  • Anand, M., Gonzalez, A., Guichard, F., Kolasa, J., & Parrott, L. (2010). Ecological systems as complex systems: Challenges for an emerging science. Diversity, 2(3), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.3390/d2030395
  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. P. & T. Urdan (Ed.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Bar-Yam, Y., McKay, S. R., & Christian, W. (1998). Dynamics of complex systems (Studies in nonlinearity). Computers in Physics, 12(4), 335. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4822633
  • Ben Zvi - Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 518–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20061
  • Ben Zvi - Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2010). Four case studies, six years later: Developing system thinking skills in junior high school and sustaining them over time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(10), 1253–1280. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20383
  • Bobek, O., Gal, A., Saltz, D., & Motro, U. (2018). Effect of nest-site microclimatic conditions on nesting success in the Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni. Bird Study, 65(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2018.1522294
  • Boud, D. (2001). Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with each other. In D. Boud, R. Cohen, & J. Sampson (Eds.), Making the move to peer learning (pp. 1–20). Routledge.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Brkich, K. L. (2014). Urban fifth graders’ connections-making between formal earth science content and their lived experiences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9505-8
  • Buxton, C. A. (2010). Social problem solving through science: An approach to critical, place-based, science teaching and learning. Equity & Excellence in Education ISSN:, 43(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680903408932
  • Can, Ö. K., Lane, J. F., & Ateşkan, A. (2017). Facilitating place-based environmental education through bird studies: An action research investigation. Environmental Education Research, 23(5), 733–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1233389
  • Chasman, D., Siahpirani, A., & Roy, S. (2016). Network-based approaches for analysis of complex biological systems. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 39, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.04.007
  • Chen, J., & Cowie, B. (2013). Engaging primary students in learning about New Zealand birds: A socially relevant context. International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1344–1366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.763194
  • Chi, M. T. H., Roscoe, R. D., Slotta, J. D., Roy, M., & Chase, C. C. (2012). Misconceived causal explanations for emergent processes. Cognitive Science, 36(1), 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01207.x
  • Cortright, R. N., Collins, H. L., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2005). Peer instruction enhanced meaningful learning: Ability to solve novel problems. American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, 29(2), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00060.2004
  • DeWitt, J., & Osborne, J. (2007). Supporting teachers on science-focused school trips: Towards an integrated framework of theory and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 29(6), 685–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600802254
  • Di Maggio, R., Campobello, D., & Sarà, M. (2013). Nest aggregation and reproductive synchrony promote Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni seasonal fitness. Journal of Ornithology, 154(4), 901–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-013-0954-3
  • Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., & Teamey, K. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107–112.
  • Dimante, D., Tambovceva, T., & Atstaja, D. (2016). Raising environmental awareness through education. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 26(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCEELL.2016.078446
  • Dreyfus, A., Wals, A., & Daan, van W. (1999). Biodiversity as a postmodern theme for environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 4, 155–176.
  • Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students’ understandings of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 938–959. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea
  • Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2009). From everyday to scientific observation: How children learn to observe the biologist’s world. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 39–68. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325899
  • Endreny, A. H. (2010). Urban 5th graders conceptions during a place-based inquiry unit on watersheds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20348
  • Fossey, E., Harvey, C., Mcdermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 717–732.
  • Gal, A., & Yosef, R. (2018). The contribution of citizen science to the conservation of the Lesser Kestrel (Falco naumanni) in Israel. The Raptor Research Foundation, 52(4), 511–515.
  • Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: from research design to analysis and publication. NYU press.
  • Gilissen, M. G. R., Knippels, M. P. J., Verhoeff, R. P., & Joolingen, R. Van. (2019). Teachers’ and educators’ perspectives on systems thinking and its implementation in Dutch biology education. Journal of Biological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1609564
  • Gorghiu, G., & Santi, E. A. (2016). Applications of experiential learning in Science education non-formal contexts. Paper Presented at the ICEEPSY 2016: 7th International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology, Rhodes, Greece. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.11.33
  • Greenwald, E., Segre, E., & Feinerman, O. (2015). Ant trophallactic networks: Simultaneous measurement of interaction patterns and food dissemination. Scientific Reports, 5, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12496
  • Grotzer, T. A., & Basca, B. B. (2003). How does grasping the underlying causal structures of ecosystems impact students’ understanding? Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655891
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Understanding complex systems: Some core challenges. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Pfeffer, M. G. (2004). Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cognitive Science, 28(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(03)00065-X
  • Holland, A. S. (1995). Inflation and uncertainty: Tests for temporal ordering. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27(3), 827. https://doi.org/10.2307/2077753
  • IUCN. (1970). International working meeting on environmental education in the school curriculum (Paris, UNESCO).
  • IUCN. (2018). The IUCN redlist of threatened species. https://doi.org/10. 2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22696357A87325202.en.
  • Jacobson, M. (2001). Problem solving about complex systems: Differences between experts and novices. Complexity, 6(3), 41–49.
  • Jacobson, M., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 10–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501
  • Johnson, J., & Tunnicliffe, S. (2000). Primary children talk about plant in the garden. Paper Presented at the The 90th National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), New Orleans, USA. https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/156242636?q&versionId=170316459
  • Jones, G. A., & Sieving, K. E. (2006). Intercropping sunflower in organic vegetables to augment bird predators of arthropods. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 117(2–3), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.03.026
  • Kameza, M., & Konstantinos, R. (2006). An approach to the introduction of elementary astronomy concepts in early education. Paper Presented at the Education ConferenceEuropean Conference on Educational Research, University of Geneva. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/157797.htm
  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
  • Keynan, A., Ben Zvi - Assaraf, O., & Goldman, D. (2014). The repertory grid as a tool for evaluating the development of students’ ecological system thinking abilities. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.09.012
  • Klein, A. M., Vaissière, B. E., Cane, J. H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S. A., Kremen, C., & Tscharntke, T. (2007). Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1608), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3721
  • Knippels, M.-C. P. J., & Waarlo, A. J. (2018). Development, uptake, and wider applicability of the yo-yo strategy in biology education research: A reappraisal. Education Sciences, 8(129), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030129
  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience As The Source Of Learning And Edevelopment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Krist, C., Schwarz, C. V., & Reiser, B. J. (2019). Identifying essential epistemic heuristics for guiding mechanistic reasoning in science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 160–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1510404
  • Krogh, E., & Jolly, L. (2012). Relationship-based experiential learning in practical outdoor tasks. Learning for Sustainability in Times of Accelerating Change, 213–224. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-757-8
  • Latta, G., & Swigger, K. (1992). Validation of the repertory grid for use in modeling knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(2), 115–129.
  • Latumahina, F. S., & Mardiatmoko, G. (2019). Distribution of endemic birds in protected forests in Indonesia. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 14(7), 405–416.
  • Liven-Schulman, I., Leshem, Y., Alon, D., & Yom-Tov, Y. (2004). Causes of population declines of the Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni in Israel. Ibis, 146(1), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00245.x
  • Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2010). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice. Jossey-Bass A Wiley, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Magntorn, O., & Gustav F Helldén. (2006). Reading nature-experienced teachers’ reflections on a teaching sequence in ecology implications for future teacher training. Nordina: Nordic Studies in Science Education, 66–81.
  • Mihoub, J. B., Gimenez, O., Pilard, P., & Sarrazin, F. (2010). Challenging conservation of migratory species: Sahelian rainfalls drive first-year survival of the vulnerable Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni. Biological Conservation, 143(4), 839–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.026
  • NGSS. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. In Achieve, Inc. on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
  • Nie, Y., Xiao, Y., Fritchman, J. C., Liu, Q., Han, J., Xiong, J., & Bao, L. (2019). Teaching towards knowledge integration in learning force and motion. International Journal of Science Education, 41(16), 2271–2295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1672905
  • Orion, N. (1993). A model for the development and implementation of field trips as an integral part of the science curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 93(6), 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1993.tb12254.x
  • Orion, N. (2007). A holistic approach for science education for all. Science, 3(2), 111–118.
  • Plate, R. (2010). Assessing individuals’ understanding of nonlinear causal structures in complex systems. 26(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr
  • Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A Review of Research on Outdoor Learning. https://www.field-studies-council.org/documents/general/NFER/NFER Exec Summary.pdf
  • Rosenbaum, M., & Leibel, R. L. (2016). Models of energy homeostasis in response to maintenance of reduced body weight. Obesity, 24(8), 1620–1629. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21559
  • Rozenszajn, R., & Yarden, A. (2015). Exposing biology teachers’ tacit views about the knowledge that is required for teaching using the repertory grid technique. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 47, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.06.001
  • Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B. (2005). Does what we feel affect what we learn? Some answers and new questions. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.015
  • Sauvé, L. (2005). Currents in environmental education: Mapping a complex and evolving pedagogical field. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 10, 11–37. https://doi.org/ISSN-1205-5352
  • Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences (4th ed.). York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Smith-sebasto, N. J. (1995). The effects of an environmental studies course on selected variables related to environmentally responsible behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 26(4), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1995.9941449
  • Smith, G., & Sobel, D. (2010). Bring it on home. Educational Leadship, 68(1), 38–43.
  • Smyth, J. C. (2006). Environment and education: A view of a changing scene. Environmental Education Research, 12(3–4), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620600942642
  • Snapir, Z., Eberbach, C., Ben Zvi - Assaraf, O., Hmelo-Silver, C., & Tripto, J. (2017). Characterising the development of the understanding of human body systems in high-school biology students – A longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2092–2127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1364445
  • Stewart, M. (2012). Joined up thinking? Evaluating the use of concept-mapping to develop complex system learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(3), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.534764
  • Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. D. (2007). Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. System Dynamics Review, 23(22), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr
  • Thébault, E., & Loreau, M. (2006). The relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in food webs. Ecological Research, 21(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-005-0127-9
  • Tilbury, D. (2011). Education for sustainable development: An expert review of processes and learning. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
  • Trumbull, D. J., Bonney, R., & Grudens-Schuck, N. (2005). Developing materials to promote inquiry: Lessons learned. Science Education, 89(6), 879–900. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20081
  • Vattam, S. S., Goel, A. K., Rugaber, S., Hmelo-Silver, C., Jordan, R., Gray, S., & Sinha, S. (2011). Understanding complex natural systems by articulating structure-behavior-function models. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 66–81.
  • Wallington, T. J., Hobbs, R. J., & Moore, S. A. (2005). Implications of current ecological thinking for biodiversity conservation: A review of the salient issues. Ecology and Society, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01256-100115
  • Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative Research Interviewing - Biographic Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421303064
  • Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Social and ethical issues in science education: A prelude to action. Science and Education, 17(8–9), 799–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9130-6
  • Zimmerman, H. T., & Weible, J. L. (2017). Learning in and about rural places: Connections and tensions between students’ everyday experiences and environmental quality issues in their community. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9757-1
  • Zion, M., Spektor-Levy, O., Orchan, Y., Shwartz, A., Sadeh, I., & Kark, S. (2011). Tracking invasive birds: A programme for implementing dynamic open inquiry learning and conservation education. Journal of Biological Education, 45(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.537833
  • Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: Current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.847261
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.