Research Article

Conversations About Evolution During Family Visits to an Exhibition About Darwin in a Mexican Museum: An Analysis of Scientific Reasoning

Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2022, 18(2), e2267,
Full Text (PDF)


Studies investigating the conversations held in museum settings have proved important for understanding the learning experiences of their visitors. The aim of this mixed-methods study is to analyze the experiences of families on visits to an exhibition on Charles Darwin at Museu Trompo Mágico (Guadalajara, Mexico), particularly their conversations about evolution and what types of scientific reasoning they employed. Ten family groups with a total of 42 visitors participated in the study. The visits were recorded and the audiovisual material loaded into the Dedoose 8.0.23 software, for analysis of the conversations using a protocol which includes three types of reasoning: (i) evolutionary – rudimentary (not in-depth) Darwinian scientific thinking; (ii) intuitive – everyday common-sense explanations; and (iii) mixed – drawing on evolutionary and intuitive reasoning. The results indicate that the exhibition sparked the families’ interest and curiosity: in 24% of the total visit time, they held conversations about evolution-related topics and themes. At that time, the most used reasoning was intuitive reasoning, code applied 124 times, followed by evolutionary reasoning (118 times) and mixed reasoning (120 times). Our results provide evidence that the exhibition brought families closer to scientific knowledge about evolution, prompting conversations about evolutionary terms and topics, in the three types of scientific reasoning investigated. As implications, this study demonstrates that understanding what family members talk about and deciphering how they apply reasoning patterns can help in the definition and structuring of exhibition learning, assist in the reasoning transition process and in the assimilation of concepts that are the basis for understanding evolutionary processes.


informal education science museums scientific reasoning families


Massarani, L., Nepote, A. C., Beck, J., & Scalfi, G. (2022). Conversations About Evolution During Family Visits to an Exhibition About Darwin in a Mexican Museum: An Analysis of Scientific Reasoning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(2), e2267.
Massarani, L., Nepote, A. C., Beck, J., and Scalfi, G. (2022). Conversations About Evolution During Family Visits to an Exhibition About Darwin in a Mexican Museum: An Analysis of Scientific Reasoning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(2), e2267.
Massarani L, Nepote AC, Beck J, Scalfi G. Conversations About Evolution During Family Visits to an Exhibition About Darwin in a Mexican Museum: An Analysis of Scientific Reasoning. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(2):e2267.
Massarani L, Nepote AC, Beck J, Scalfi G. Conversations About Evolution During Family Visits to an Exhibition About Darwin in a Mexican Museum: An Analysis of Scientific Reasoning. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(2), e2267.
Massarani, Luisa, Ana Claudia Nepote, Jessica Beck, and Graziele Scalfi. "Conversations About Evolution During Family Visits to an Exhibition About Darwin in a Mexican Museum: An Analysis of Scientific Reasoning". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2022 18 no. 2 (2022): e2267.
Massarani, Luisa et al. "Conversations About Evolution During Family Visits to an Exhibition About Darwin in a Mexican Museum: An Analysis of Scientific Reasoning". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 18, no. 2, 2022, e2267.


  1. Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 259-303). Erlbaum.
  2. Allen, S. (2004). Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Science Education, 88(Suppl. 1), S17-S33.
  3. Ash, D., Crain, R., Brandt, C., Loomis, M., Wheaton, M., & Bennett, C. (2007). Talk, tools and tensions: Observing biological talk over time. International Journal of Science Education, 29(12), 1581-1602.
  4. Bamberger Y., & Tal T. (2008). Multiple outcomes of class visits to natural history museums: The students’ view. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 274-284.
  5. Banet, E., & Ayuso, G. E. (2003). Teaching of biological inheritance and evolution of living beings in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 373-407.
  6. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. A Report of the National Research Council of the National Academies. The National Academies Press.
  7. Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415-427.
  8. Bizzo, N. M. V. (1994). From down house landlord to Brazilian high school students: What has happened to evolutionary knowledge on the way? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 537-556.
  9. Borun, M. (2002). Being human: A design in process, four focus groups. University of Pennsylvania Museum: Museum Solutions.
  10. Brumby, M. N. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education, 68(4), 493-503.
  11. Ceci, C. (2009). Darwin: Origin and evolution of an exhibition. Evolution, Education and Outreach, 2, 560-563.
  12. Crowley, K., Callanan, M., Jipson, J., Galco, J., Topping, K., & Shrager, J. (2001). Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent – child activity. Science Education, 85, 712-732.
  13. Diamond J., & Evans E. M. (2007). Museums teach evolution. Evolution, 61(6), 1500-1506.
  14. Diario Oficial de la Federación (DOF). (1999). Ley del Instituto Mexicano de la Juventud [Law of the Mexican Institute of Youth].
  15. Díaz, F., & Hernández, G. (2002). Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo: Una interpretación constructivista [Teaching strategies for meaningful learning: A constructivist interpretation]. Editorial Mc Graw Hill.
  16. Dierking, L. D., Ellenbogen, K. M., & Falk, J. H. (2004). In principle, in practice: Perspectives on a decade of museum learning research (1994-2004). Science Education, 88(Suppl. 1), S1-S96.
  17. Dunckel, B. A., Ellis, S., MacFadden, B. J., Dierking, L. D., Abraham-Silver, L., Kisiel, J., & Koke, J. (2005). Natural history museum visitors’ understanding of evolution by natural selection: Florida Museum of Natural History Evolution Project Report. Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida.
  18. Elkonin, D. B. (1969). Característica general del desarrollo psíquico de los niños. [General characteristic of children’s psychic development]. In A. A. Smirnov, A. N. Leontiev, S. L. Rubinsthein, & B. M., Tieplov (Eds.), Psicología (pp. 493-503). Grijalbo.
  19. Ellenbogen, K. M., Luke, J. J., & Dierking, L. D. (2004). Family learning research in museums: An emerging disciplinary matrix? Science Education, 88(Suppl. 1), S48-S58.
  20. Evans, E. M. (2000). The emergence of beliefs about the origins of species in school-age children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly-Journal of Developmental Psychology, 46, 221-254.
  21. Evans, E. M. (2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 217-266.
  22. Evans, E. M. (2008). Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: a developmental analysis. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change. (pp. 263-294). Routledge.
  23. Evans, E. M., Spiegel, A. N, Gram, W., Frazier, B. F., Tare, M., Thompson, S., & Diamond, J. (2010). A conceptual guide to natural history museum visitors’ understanding of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 326-353.
  24. Evans, E. M., Weiss, M., Lane, J., & Palmquist, S. (2015). The spiral model: Integrating research and exhibit development to foster conceptual change. In D. M. Sobel, & J. Jipson (Eds.), Cognitive development in museum settings: Relating research and practice (pp. 36-64). Psychology Press.
  25. Fender, J. G., & Crowley K. (2007). How parent explanation changes what children learn from everyday scientific thinking. Journal of Applied Developmental Psycology, 28(3), 189-210.
  26. Gallup. (2009). National science education standards. National Academy Press.
  27. Gobierno del Estado de Jalisco - México. (2015). Llegada Darwin al museo Trompo Mágico [Darwin arrival at the Trompo Mágico museum].
  28. Gómez, O. G. (2004). La apuesta educativa del “Trompo Mágico” museo interactivo de Guadalajara. [The educational commitment of the Guadalajara “Trompo Mágico” interactive museum]. Mediaciones, 2(3), 167-179.
  29. González-Medina, J. P. (2013). Viaje de un naturalista en el Museo de la Ciencia y el juego. Experiencias de divulgación de la biología a través de la lúdica. [The journey of a naturalist at the Museum of Science and Game. Experiences of divulgation of biology through ludic activities]. Biográfia, Escritos Sobre la Biología y sus Enseñanzas [Biography, Writings on Biology and its Teachings], 6(1), 195-204.
  30. Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution Education Outreach, 2,156-175.
  31. Guisti, E. (1994). Summative evaluation of the hall of human biology and evolution. What can we learn from visitors. American Museum of Natural History.
  32. Haden, C. A., Jant, E. A., Hoffman, P. C., Marcus, M., Geddes, J. R., & Gaskins, S. (2014). Supporting family conversations and children’s STEM learning in a children’s museum. Science Direct, 29(3), 333-344.
  33. Hohenstein, J., & Missouri, T. (2018). Museum learning: Theory and research as tools for enhancing practice. Routledge.
  34. Horn, M. S., Phillips, B. C., Evans, E. M., Block, F., Diamond, J., & Shen, C. (2016). Visualizing biological data in museums: Visitor learning with an interactive tree of life exhibit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9999(00), 1-24.
  35. Jant, E. A., Haden, C. A., Uttal, D. H., & Babcock, E. (2014). Conversation and object manipulation influence children’s learning in a museum. Child Development, 85(5), 2029-2045.
  36. Jiménez, A. G. & Muñoz, A. M. (2015). Análisis de las hipótesis evolutivas en alumnos de educación secundaria y bachillerato [Analysis of the evolutionary hypotheses of secondary education and high school students]. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias [Electronic Journal of Science Teaching], 14(1), 35-54.
  37. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo Rodríguez, A., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). Doing the lesson? Or doing science?: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792.<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
  38. Kargbo, D. B., Hobbs, E. D., & Erickson, G. L. (1980). Children’s beliefs about inherited characteristics. Journal of Biological Education, 14(2), 137-146.
  39. Kisiel, J., Rowe, S., Vartabedian, M. A., & Kopczak, C. (2012). Evidence for family engagement in scientific reasoning at interactive animal exhibits. Science Education, 96(6), 1047-1070.
  40. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press.
  41. Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 155-178.
  42. Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337.
  43. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
  44. Land-Zandstra, A. M., Hoefakker, K., & Damsma, W. (2020). Reasoning about objects in a Natural History Museum: The effect of complexity of questions on object labels. Visitor Studies, 23(2), 218-236.
  45. Leinhardt, G., & Knutson, K. (2004). Listening in on museum conversations. AltaMira Press.
  46. Leinhardt, G., Crowley, K., & Knutson, K. (Eds.). (2002). Learning conversations in museums. Erlbaum.
  47. León, E. (2019). Estrategias de enseñanza utilizadas en clases de evolución biológica. [Teaching strategies used in biological evolution classes]. Telos, 21(1), 144-165.
  48. León, E., & Morales, M. (2017). Experiencia didáctica: Las tic en la enseñanza de la evolución biológica. [Didactic experience: Tics in teaching of biological evolution]. Revista Eduweb, 11(1), 101-112.
  49. Lienesch, M. (2007). In the beginning: Fundamentalism, the scopes trial, and the making of the antievolution movement. University of North Carolina Press.
  50. Massarani, L. (2015). Voices from other lands. Public Understanding of Science, 24(1), 2-5.
  51. Massarani, L., Fazio, M. E., Rocha, J. N., Dávila, A., Espinosa, S., & Bognanni, F. A. (2019b). La interactividad en los museos de ciencias, pivote entre expectativas y hechos empíricos: el caso del Centro Interactivo de Ciencia y Tecnología Abremate (Argentina) [Interactivity in science museums, pivot between expectations and empirical facts: the case of the Abremate Interactive Science and Technology Center (Argentina)]. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 25(2), 467-484.
  52. Massarani, L., Mucci Poenaru, L., Norberto Rocha J., Rowe, S., & Falla, S. (2019c). Adolescents learning with exhibits and explainers: the case of Maloka. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 9(3), 253-267
  53. Massarani, L., Norberto Rocha, J., Scalfi G., Silveira Y., Cruz, W., & Lage dos Santos Guedes L (2021). Families visit the museum: A study on family interactions and conversations at the Museum of the Universe – Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). Frontiers in Education, 6, 669467.
  54. Massarani, L., Reznik, G., Norberto, J., Falla, S., Rowe, S., Martins, A. D., & Amorim, L. (2019a). A experiência de adolescentes ao visitar um museu de ciência: Um estudo no museu da vida [Adolescents' experience when visiting a science museum: A study in the museum of life]. Ensaio: Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 21, e10524.
  55. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Belknap.
  56. McManus, P. M. (1994). Families in museums. In R., Miles, & L. Zavala (Eds.), Towards the museum of the future: New European perspectives (pp. 81-97). Routledge.
  57. National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. National Academies Press.
  58. Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioScience, 57(3), 263-272.
  59. Patiño Barba, M. L., Padilla González, J., & Massarani, L. (2017). Diagnóstico de la divulgación de la ciencia en América Latina: Una mirada a la práctica en el campo. [Diagnosis of science dissemination in Latin America: A look at the practice in the field]. RedPOP, Unesco.
  60. Randol, S. M. (2005). The nature of inquiry in science centers: Describing and assessing inquiry at exhibits [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California.
  61. Rigney, J. C., & Callanan, M. A. (2011). Patterns in parent–child conversations about animals at a marine science center. Cognitive Development, 26(2), 155-171.
  62. Rowe S., & O’Brien, S. (2016). Pesquisa sobre aprendizagem em museus: Um campo em busca de foco? [Research on learning in museums: A field in search of focus?]. In L. Massarani, R. Neves, & L. Amorim (Orgs). Divulgação científica e museus de ciências: O olhar do visitante - Memórias do evento. Museu da Vida/Casa de Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz; RedPop, 104p.
  63. Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
  64. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005a). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71-93.
  65. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005b). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138.
  66. Sáez, S. P. C., & Albaladejo, C. M. (2017). La evolución biológica en las exposiciones del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales [Biological evolution in the exhibitions of the Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales]. Evolución, 12(1), 73-79.
  67. Sánchez Mora, M. C. (2000). La enseñanza de la teoría de la evolución a partir de las concepciones alternativas de los estudiantes [Teaching the evolution theory from students’ alternative conceptions]. [Doctoral dissertation, Facultad de Ciencias, División de estudios de posgrado México]. Repositorio Universitario Especializado en Comunicación Pública de la Ciencia.D.F: UNAM.
  68. Sánchez Mora, M. C., & Ramírez, C. L. (2016). Efectos sobre el aprendizaje informal de la evolución biológica como resultado de la mediación museal [Effects on informal learning of biological evolution as a result of museum mediation]. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias [Eureka Magazine on Science Teaching and Dissemination], 13(2), 315-341.
  69. Silva, T. C. R., & Gomes, A. C. F. (2009). A importância dos desenhos animados como representação ideológica: Formação da identidade infantil [The importance of cartoons as an ideological representation: Formation of children’s identity]. Iniciação Científica CESUMAR [Scientific Initiation CESUMAR], 11(1), 37-43.
  70. Soares, B. C., Vieira, B. M., & Fonseca, L. C. S. (2013). Procurando Nemo: O uso da animação para o ensino de ciências [Finding Nemo: Using animation for science teaching]. Revista da SBEnBio, 7, 936-948.
  71. Spiegel, A. N., Evans, E. M., Frazier, B., Hazel, A., Tare, M., Gram, W., & Diamond, J. (2012). Changing museum visitors’ conceptions of evolution. Evolution Education Outreach, 5, 43-61.
  72. Spiegel, A. N., Evans, E. M., Gram, W., & Diamond, J. (2006). Museum visitors’ understanding of evolution. Museums & Social Issues, 1(1), 69-86.
  73. Stein, J. K., & Storksdieck, M. (2005). Life changes museum visitor survey: Summary of results. Institute for Learning Innovation.
  74. Tapia, F., & Arteaga, Y. (2009). Estrategias para la enseñanza de la célula aplicadas por docentes de educación básica [Strategies for teaching the cell applied by basic education teachers]. Revista Educare [Education Magazine], 13(1), 97-120.
  75. Tare, M., French, J., Frazier, B. N., Diamond, J., & Evans, E. M. (2011). Explanatory parent–child conversation predominates at an evolution exhibit. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
  76. Topcu, M. S., Sadler, T. D., & Yilmaz‐Tuzun, O. (2010). Preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning about socioscientific issues: The influence of issue context. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 24752495.
  77. Wilensky, U., & Reisman, K. (2006). Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—An embodied modeling approach. Cognition and Instruction, 24(2), 171-209.
  78. Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20(1), 99-149.
  79. Zimmerman, H. T., Reeve, S., & Bell, P. (2009). Family sense-making practices in science center conversations. Science Education, 94, 478-505.


Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.