Examining the Use of PhET Simulations on Students’ Attitudes and Learning in General Chemistry II
Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2021, 17(4), e2247, https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10966
Chemistry is considered difficult to students to learn because many of its concepts are abstract in nature and require visualization at the sub-microscopic level of representation. Physics Education Technology (PhET) offers students the ability to understand and relate both chemical systems and what is happening at the sub-microscopic level through dynamic visualization. Simulations like PhET can be used as a powerful transformative tool for the teaching and learning of science. The research design and paradigm goal is to investigate the students’ perceptions on the impact of PhET simulations on their learning and attitudes and to identify PhET’s most helpful features. The data gathering tool in this research project is a survey that comprised of Likert-type and open-ended questions that was handed out to students who have completed General Chemistry II and were acquainted with PhET simulations as part of their laboratory sessions. The research took place at the City College of New York, an urban, minority serving, and public college. The number of research participants is 158. The implications of the research findings are PhET interactive simulations have an overall positive impact on students’ attitudes and perceptions about learning, PhET simulations promote students’ development of conceptual understanding of chemistry concepts and content, PhET simulations seem to promote and facilitate learning and understanding of abstract concepts, and PhET simulations furnish learning opportunities that otherwise cannot be attained in a traditional laboratory setting. The data presented in this paper support the notion that there is a need to update and modify general chemistry laboratories to reflect emerging technologies such as PhET interactive simulations.
Salame, I. I., & Makki, J. (2021). Examining the Use of PhET Simulations on Students’ Attitudes and Learning in General Chemistry II. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2247. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10966
Salame, I. I., and Makki, J. (2021). Examining the Use of PhET Simulations on Students’ Attitudes and Learning in General Chemistry II. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2247. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10966
Salame II, Makki J. Examining the Use of PhET Simulations on Students’ Attitudes and Learning in General Chemistry II. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2021;17(4):e2247. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10966
Salame II, Makki J. Examining the Use of PhET Simulations on Students’ Attitudes and Learning in General Chemistry II. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2021;17(4), e2247. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10966
Salame, Issa I, and Jana Makki. "Examining the Use of PhET Simulations on Students’ Attitudes and Learning in General Chemistry II". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2021 17 no. 4 (2021): e2247. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10966
Salame, Issa I et al. "Examining the Use of PhET Simulations on Students’ Attitudes and Learning in General Chemistry II". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 17, no. 4, 2021, e2247. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10966
- Adams, W.K., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., McKagan, S.B., Perkins, K.K., Dubson, M. & Wieman, C.E. (2008). A study of educational simulations part I - Engagement and learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(3), 397-419.
- Adams, W.K., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., McKagan, S., Perkins, K., Dubson, M. & Wieman, C.E. (2008). A study of educational simulations part II – Interface design. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(4), 551-577.
- Alsultanny, Y. A., Nouby, A. M., & Al-Enazi, T. T. (2014). Effects of using simulation in e-learning programs on misconceptions and motivations towards learning. International Journal of Science of Technology Educational Research, 5(3), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJSTER2010.043
- Baltzis, K. B., & Koukias, K. D. (2009). Using laboratory experiments and circuit simulation IT tools in an undergraduate course in analog electronics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(6), 546-555. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/76294/
- Bell, R. B., & Smetana, L. K. (2008). Using computer simulations to enhance science teaching and learning, National Science Teachers Association, 3, 23-32.
- Bing, T. J. & Redish, E. F. (2012). Epistemic complexity and the journeyman-expert transition. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 8, 010105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010105
- Biehle, J. T, Motz, L. L., & West. S. S. (1999). NSTA guide to school science facilities. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
- Blake, C., & Scanlon, E. (2007). Reconsidering simulations in science education at a distance: features of effective use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(6), 491-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00239.x
- Bopegedera, A. M. R. P. (2011). Putting the laboratory at the center of teaching chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(4), 443-448. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100045z
- Bortnik, B., Stozhko, N., Pervukhina, I., Tchernysheva, A., & Belysheva, G. (2017). Effect of virtual analytical chemistry laboratory on enhancing student research skills and practices. Research in Learning Technology, 25. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1968
- Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Kong, J. N. L., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., & Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do different levels of inquiry lead to different learning outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937-1959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.886347
- Chamberlain, J. M., Lancaster, K., Parson, R., & Perkins, K. K. (2014). How guidance aﬀects student engagement with an interactive simulation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 628-638. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00009a
- Clark, T. M., & Chamberlain, J. M. (2014). Use of a PhET interactive simulation in general chemistry: The hydrogen atom. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(8), 1198-102. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400454p
- Couch, A. S. (2014). The impact of virtual simulations on student comprehension of mechanics. LSU Master's Theses. 151.
- Correia, A., Koehler, N., Thompson, A., & Phye, G. (2019). The application of PhET simulation to teach gas behavior on the submicroscopic level: secondary school students’ perceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(2), 193-217, https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1487834
- Debowska, E., Girwidz, R., Greczyło, T., Kohnle, A., Mason, B., Mathelitsch, L., Melder, T., Michelini, M., Ruddock, I., & Silva, J. (2013). Report and recommendations on multimedia materials for teaching and learning electricity and magnetism. European Journal of Physics, 34, L47-L54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/34/3/L47
- Erlin Eveline, J., Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). The Effect of scaffolding approach assisted by phet simulation on students’ conceptual understanding and students’ learning independence in physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233, 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012036
- Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
- Hsu, Y. S., Lin, Y.-H. & Yang, B. (2017). Impact of augmented reality lessons on students’ STEM interest. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0039-z
- Kim, M., & Hannaﬁn, M. (2011). Scaffolding problem-solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56, 403-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.024
- Lazonder, A. W.; & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681-718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
- Limniou, M., Papadopoulos, N., Giannakoudakis, A., Roberts, D., & Otto, O. (2007). The integration of a viscosity simulator in a chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 220-231. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90032A
- Lindgren, R., & Schwartz, D. L. (2009). Spatial learning and computer simulations in science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 419-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802595813
- Lunetta, V. N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and contexts for contemporary teaching. In K. Tobin, & B. Fraser (Eds.). International handbook of science education, (pp. 249-264).
- Makransky, G., Terkildsena, T. S. & Mayer, R. E. (2017). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007
- Moore, E. B., Herzog, T. A. & Perkins, K. K. (2013). Interactive simulations as implicit support for guided-inquiry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP20157K
- Moore E. B., Chamberlain, J. M., Parson, R., & Perkins, K. K. (2014). PhET interactive simulations: Transformative tools for teaching chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1191-1197. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed4005084
- National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2004). NSTA Position Statement: Scientific Inquiry.
- National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2006). NSTA Position Statement: Professional Development in Science Instruction.
- National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering; National Academies Press: Washington, DC.
- Penn, M. & Ramnarain, U. (2019). South African university students’ attitudes towards chemistry learning in a virtually simulated learning environment. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20, 699-710. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00014C
- Perkins, K. Moore, E. & Chasteen, S. (2014). Examining the Use of PhET interactive simulations in US College and high school classrooms, Conference: 2014 Physics Education Research Conference, 207-210. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc. pr.048
- Perkins, K., Podolefsky, N., Lancaster, K. & Moore, E. (2012). Creating Effective Interactive Tools for Learning: Insights from the PhET Interactive Simulations Project. In T. Amiel & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2012-World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 436-441). Denver, Colorado, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 17, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/40781/
- Price, A., Perkins, K., Holmes, N., & Wieman, C. (2018, August 1-2). How and why do high school teachers use PhET interactive simulations? Paper presented at Physics Education Research Conference 2018, Washington, DC. Retrieved September 20, 2020, from https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=14842&DocID=4989
- Prima, C. E., Putri, A. R., & Rustaman, N. (2018). Learning solar system using PhET simulation to improve students’ understanding and motivation. Journal of Science Learning, 1(2), 60-70. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v1i2.10239
- Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W., & van der Veen, J. T. (2011). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
- Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2011). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1337-1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.605182
- Smith, K., & Villarreal, S. (2015). A reply to ‘‘Reinterpretation of students’ ideas when reasoning about particle model illustrations. A response to ‘‘Using animations in identifying general chemistry students’ misconceptions and evaluating their knowledge transfer relating to particle position in physical changes’’ by Smith and Villarreal. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(3). https://doi.org/701.10.1039/C5RP00095E
- Watson, S., Dubrovskiy, A., & Peters, M. (2020). Increasing chemistry students' knowledge, confidence, and conceptual understanding of ph using a collaborative computer ph simulation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 21, 528-535. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00235A
- Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). PhET: simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322, 682-683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161948
- Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., Loeblein, P., & Perkins, K. K. (2010). Teaching physics using PhET simulations. The Physics Teacher, 48, 225. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3361987
- Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2012.10.024
- Yusuf, I., & Widyaningsih, S. W. (2019). HOTS profile of physics education students in STEM-based classes using PhET media. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 032021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032021
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.