INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SCIENCE EDUCATION
Research Article

Key Definitions of STEM Education: Literature Review

Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2020, 16(3), e2217, https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8336
Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This literature review aims to identify common theme in STEM education and to find out the scope of STEM education from previous studies that would provide information to researchers as well as the stakeholders on how they should focus on the implementation of STEM education. The author creates the research questions, “What are the common themes in STEM education?” and “What are scopes in STEM education that can cover the common themes based on the literature reviews?”. The literature search in electronic databases was conducted through the Education Resources Information Center, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar using the varieties of Keyword such as “STEM education”, “STEM Implementation”, “STEM definitions”, “Instruction”, “Curriculum”, “Major”, “Career”. The author concludes that the definitions of STEM education depend on the stakeholders in the implementation. Four key definitions and three scopes that cover those key definitions based on literature reviews are found and discussed.

KEYWORDS

STEM education STEM definitions STEM disciplines instruction major career

CITATION (APA)

Hasanah, U. (2020). Key Definitions of STEM Education: Literature Review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(3), e2217. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8336
Harvard
Hasanah, U. (2020). Key Definitions of STEM Education: Literature Review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(3), e2217. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8336
Vancouver
Hasanah U. Key Definitions of STEM Education: Literature Review. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2020;16(3):e2217. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8336
AMA
Hasanah U. Key Definitions of STEM Education: Literature Review. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2020;16(3), e2217. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8336
Chicago
Hasanah, Uswatun. "Key Definitions of STEM Education: Literature Review". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2020 16 no. 3 (2020): e2217. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8336
MLA
Hasanah, Uswatun "Key Definitions of STEM Education: Literature Review". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 16, no. 3, 2020, e2217. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8336

REFERENCES

  1. Beswick, K., & Fraser, S. (2019). Developing mathematics teachers’ 21st Century Competence for teaching in STEM contexts. ZDM, 51(6), 955-965. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01084-2
  2. Boe, M. V., Henriksen, E. K., Lyons, T., & Schreiner, C. (2011). Participation in science and technology: Young people’s achievement-related choices in late-modern societies. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 37-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.549621
  3. Bozkurt, A., Ucar, H., Durak, G., & Idin, S. (2019). The current state of the art in STEM research: A systematic review study. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(3), 374-383. http://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v14i3.3447w
  4. Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of stem in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 1-11.
  5. Burghardt, M. D., & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design: A contemporary approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology. The Technology Teacher, 64(1), 6-8.
  6. Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM Education? American Association for the Advancement of Science, 329(5995), 996. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194998
  7. Ching, Y.-H., Yang, D., Wang, S., Baek, Y., Swanson, S., & Chittoori, B. (2019). Elementary school student development of STEM attitudes and perceived learning in a STEM integrated robotics curriculum. TechTrends, 63(5), 590-601. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00388-0
  8. Dugger, W. E. (2010). Evaluation of STEM in the United States. Paper presented at The 6th Biennial International Conference in Technology Education Research’nda sunulmus bildiri, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  9. Eckman, E. W., Williams, M. A., & Silver-Thorn, M. B. (2016). An integrated model for STEM teacher cooperative educational experience. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 51(1), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.30707/JSTE51.1
  10. Ejiwale, J. A. (2013). Barriers to successful implementation of STEM Education. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(2), 63-74.
  11. English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x
  12. Estapa, A. T., & Tank, K. M. (2017). Supporting integrated stem in the elementary classroom: A professional development approach centered on an engineering design challenge. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(6), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0058-3
  13. Fitzallen, N. (2015). STEM education: What does mathematics have to offer? Paper presented at The 38th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Sunshine Coast.
  14. Freeman, R. B. (2005). Does globalization of the scientific/engineering workforce threaten U.S economic leadership? Innovation Policy Economy, 6(6), 123-158.
  15. Furner, J. M., & Kumar, D. D. (2007). The mathematics and science integration argument: A stand for teacher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education, 3(3), 185-189.
  16. Gandhi-Lee, E., Skaza, H., Marti, E., Schrader, P., & Orgill, M. (2017). Faculty perceptions of student recruitment and retention in STEM fields. European Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.20897/esteme.201702
  17. Green, M. M. (2006). Science and engineering degrees: 1977-2004. Retrieved from Arlington, VA:
  18. Haruna, & Ibrahim, U. (2015). The need for an effective collaboration across science, technology, engineering & mathematics (STEM) fields for a meaningful technological development in Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(25), 16-21.
  19. Hobbs, L., Clark, J. C., & Plant, B. (2018). Successful students - STEM program: Teacher learning through a multifaceted vision for STEM education. In R. Jorgensen & K. Larkin (Eds.), STEM Education in Junior Secondary (pp. 133-168). Singapore: Springer Nature.
  20. John, M.-S., Siburna, B., Wunnava, S., Anggoro, F., & Dubosarsky, M. (2018). An iterative participatory approach to developing an early childhood problem-based STEM curriculum. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/3867
  21. Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. Journal of STEM Education, 3(11), 1-11. doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
  22. Kubat, U., & Guray, E. (2018). To STEM or not to STEM? That is not the question. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(3), 388-399.
  23. Lacey, T. A., & Wright, B. (2009). Occupational employment projections to 2018. Mon Labor Rev, 132, 82-123.
  24. Maarouf, S. A. (2019). Supporting academic growth of english language learners: Integrating Reading into STEM curriculum. World Journal of Education, 9(4), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v9n4p83
  25. Marrero, M. E., Gunning, A. M., & Germain-Williams, T. (2014). What is STEM education?. Global Education Review, 1(4), 1-6.
  26. McDonald, C. V. (2016). STEM education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Science Education International, 27(4), 530-569.
  27. Morrison, J. S. (2006). TIES STEM education monograph series: Attributes of STEM education. Baltimore: MD: TIES
  28. Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 221-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1289775
  29. NAE, N. A. o. E., & NRC, N. R. C. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  30. Ostler, E. (2012). 21st Century STEM education: A tactical model for long-range success. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2(1), 28-33.
  31. Pawilen, G. T., & Yuzon, M. R. A. (2019). Planning a Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) curriculum for young children: A collaborative project for pre-service teacher education students. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 11(2), 130-146.
  32. Pleasants, J., Clough, M. P., Olson, J. K., & Miller, G. (2019). Fundamental issues regarding the nature of technology. Science & Education, 28(3-5), 561-597. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00056-y
  33. Rozek, C. S., Svoboda, R. C., Harackiewicz, J. M., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2017). Utility-value intervention with parents increases students’ STEM preparation and career pursuit. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114(5), 909-914. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607386114
  34. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71-93. doi:10.1002/sce.20023
  35. Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education. STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
  36. Sari, U., Alici, M., & Sen, O. F. (2018). The effect of STEM instruction on attitude, career perception and career interest in a problem-based learning environment and student opinions. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1-21.
  37. Schreffler, J., III, E. V., Chini, J., & James, W. (2019). Universal design for learning in postsecondary stem education for students with disabilities: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(8), 1-10. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0161-8
  38. Smith, J., & Karr-Kidwell, P. J. (2000). The interdisciplinary curriculum: A literature review and a manual for administrators and teachers. (ERIC No. ED443172).
  39. Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., McClelland, J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2011). Yearlong impressions of a middle school STEM integration program. Middle School Journal, 43, 32-40.
  40. Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28-34. http://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
  41. Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., Loof, H. D., Meester, J. D., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., . . . Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-12. http://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
  42. Wang, H.-H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636
  43. White, D. W. (2014). What is STEM education? and why is it important? Florida Association of Teacher Educators Journal, 1(14), 1-9. Retrieved from http://www.fatel.org/journals/2014/white.pdf
  44. Wright, R., & Ellis, M. (2018). Where science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) graduates move: Human Capital, employment patterns, and interstate migration in the United States. Population Space and Place, 25(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2224
  45. Yildirim, B. (2016). An analyses and mate-synthesis of research on STEM education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(34), 23-33.

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.