Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education

The Environmental Influence on the Social Activity of Birds in Buea University Campus, Southwest Region, Cameroon
Melle Ekane Maurice 1 * , Nkwatoh Athanasius Fuashi 1, Roy Lyonga Mbua 1, Ndzelen Salome Mendzen 1, Obassi-Anaman Okon 1, Nkongho Stanley Ayamba 1
More Detail
1 Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, University of Buea P. O. Box 63, Southwest Region, CAMEROON
* Corresponding Author
Research Article

Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2020 - Volume 16 Issue 2, Article No: e2210
https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6446

Published Online: 08 Jan 2020

Views: 396 | Downloads: 413

How to cite this article
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Maurice et al., 2020)
Reference: Maurice, M. E., Fuashi, N. A., Mbua, R. L., Mendzen, N. S., Okon, O., & Ayamba, N. S. (2020). The Environmental Influence on the Social Activity of Birds in Buea University Campus, Southwest Region, Cameroon. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(2), e2210. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6446
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Maurice ME, Fuashi NA, Mbua RL, Mendzen NS, Okon O, Ayamba NS. The Environmental Influence on the Social Activity of Birds in Buea University Campus, Southwest Region, Cameroon. Int J Env Sci Ed. 2020;16(2):e2210. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6446
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Maurice ME, Fuashi NA, Mbua RL, Mendzen NS, Okon O, Ayamba NS. The Environmental Influence on the Social Activity of Birds in Buea University Campus, Southwest Region, Cameroon. Int J Env Sci Ed. 2020;16(2), e2210. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6446
Chicago
In-text citation: (Maurice et al., 2020)
Reference: Maurice, Melle Ekane, Nkwatoh Athanasius Fuashi, Roy Lyonga Mbua, Ndzelen Salome Mendzen, Obassi-Anaman Okon, and Nkongho Stanley Ayamba. "The Environmental Influence on the Social Activity of Birds in Buea University Campus, Southwest Region, Cameroon". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2020 16 no. 2 (2020): e2210. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6446
Harvard
In-text citation: (Maurice et al., 2020)
Reference: Maurice, M. E., Fuashi, N. A., Mbua, R. L., Mendzen, N. S., Okon, O., and Ayamba, N. S. (2020). The Environmental Influence on the Social Activity of Birds in Buea University Campus, Southwest Region, Cameroon. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(2), e2210. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6446
MLA
In-text citation: (Maurice et al., 2020)
Reference: Maurice, Melle Ekane et al. "The Environmental Influence on the Social Activity of Birds in Buea University Campus, Southwest Region, Cameroon". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 16, no. 2, 2020, e2210. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6446
ABSTRACT
In the next decade, urban sprawl might reach such a magnitude that several natural areas surrounding cities will give way to buildings and residential areas. Although some long-term efforts to understanding wildlife dynamics in cities are under way, very little has been done in understanding the influence of urban expansion on wildlife and developing a management strategies aimed at diminishing these impacts. There is a need to study urban biodiversity and include ecological knowledge in urban planning. However, this study was focused on assessing the environmental influence on the social activity of birds in Buea university campus. The data was collected on check-sheets for a period of 2 months, 6 days a week, from 7:00am – 6:00pm. The spot-count data collection method used witnessed 616 bird observations during the study. Simultaneously, data was collected on environmental condition, day-period, bird species, bird location, and bird number. The results of this study showed a significant link between bird activity and bird species, χ2 = 171.953 df=48 P=0.000. Similarly, activity of birds showed association on bird number, χ2 = 120.254 df=40 P=0.000. The environmental conditions associated significantly with bird number, χ2 = 35.669 df=30, P<0.05. Also, bird species associated significantly with the day-period, χ2 = 171.953 df=48, P=0.000. Additionally, environmental conditions associated with bird location, χ2 = 7.921 df=6 P<0.05. Moreover, the environmental condition associated significantly with bird activity, χ2 = 28.925 df=12 P=0.004.
All the bird species observed during the survey displayed a significant activity state, however, species such as village weaver (Ploceus cucullatus), little weaver (Ploceus luteolus), and black-headed weaver (Ploceus melanocephalus), recorded 17.86%, 11.36%, and 7.31% respectively, and were observed with a higher activity frequency as compared to other bird species. The environmental role on wildlife species such as birds significantly determines their geographical distribution and endemism on the earth planet.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
  • Adams, C. J., & Dove, E. S. (1989) Designing nature reserves: traditional criteria may act as misleading indicators of quality. Biodives Conserv, 16, 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9139-1
  • Antos, M. J., Fitzsimons, J. A., Palmer, G. C., & White, J. G. (2006). Introduced birds in urban remnant vegetation: Does remnant size really matter? Austral Ecology, 31, 254-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2006.01572.x
  • Berry, B. J. L. (1990). Urbanisation. In: Turner II BL, Clark WC, Kates RW, Richards JF, Matthews JT, Meyers WB (eds.), The earth as transformed by human action. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. pp. 103-119.
  • Bibby, C. J. (2001). Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press. London.
  • Blair, R. B. (1996). Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications, 6, 506-519. https://doi.org/10.2307/2269387
  • Blair, R. B. (1999). Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: Surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity? Ecol Appl, 9, 164-170. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0164:BABAAU]2.0.CO;2
  • Blair, R. B. (2001). Creating a homogenous avifauna. In: J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, & R. Donnelly (eds.), Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanising world. Boston, Kluwer. Pp. 461-488.
  • Blair, R. B. (2004). The effects of urban sprawl on birds at multiple levels of organization. Ecol Soc, 9(5), 2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00688-090502
  • Bolger, D. T., Scott, T. A., & Rotenberry, J. T. (1997). Breeding bird abundance in an urbanizing landscape in coastal southern California. Conservation Biology, 11, 406-421. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96307.x
  • British Trust for Ornithology (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.bto.org/birdtrends
  • Cam, J. I., Schwabl, I., & Gwinner, E. (2006). Stress and the city: Urbanization and its effects on the stress physiology in European blackbirds. Ecol, 87, 1945-1952. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1945:SATCUA]2.0.CO;2
  • Clergeau, P., Savard, G., & Mennechez, G. (1998). Bird abundance and diversity along an urban- rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor, 100, 413-425. https://doi.org/10.2307/1369707
  • Collins, R. N., Miller, O. K., & Adkisson, C. S. (1976). Woodpecker dependence on trees infected by fungal heart rot. Wilson Bull, 88, 575-558.
  • Dawson, D. G., & Bull, P. C. (1975). Counting birds in New Zealand Forests. Notornis, 22, 101-109.
  • Dunning, J. B. (2007). CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420064452
  • Ekane, N. B. (2000). The Socio Economic Impact of Pronus Africana Management in the Mount Cameroon Region. Case study of the Bukwango Community (M Sc. Thesis), Department of Urban Planning and Environment, Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm
  • Emlen, J. T. (1974). An urban Bird community in Tucson, Arizona: derivation, structure, regulation. Condor, 76, 184-97. https://doi.org/10.2307/1366729
  • Erz, S. V. (1996). Song post height in relation to predator diversity and urbanization. Ethol, 117, 529-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01899.x
  • Fernandez-Juricic, E. (2000). Avifaunal use of wooded streets in an urban landscape. Conservation Biology, 14, 513-521. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98600.x
  • Fitton, J. D., Kilburn, C. R. J., Thirwall, M. F., & Hughes, D. J. (1983). 1982 eruption of Mt. Cameroon, West Africa. Nature, 306, 327e332. https://doi.org/10.1038/306327a0
  • Fitzpatrick, J. W. (1981). Search strategies of tyrant flycatchers. Anim Behav, 29, 810-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(81)80015-2
  • Fuchs, W. (1998). Impact of predation by domestic cats (Felis catus) in an urban area gradient. Ecol Appl, 6, 506-519.
  • Gatson, A. (2007). Does urbanization filter birds on the basis of their biological traits? Condor, 110, 223-240. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2008.8409
  • Hadiadian, J. K., Reynaud, P. A., & Sandstorm, W. A. (1997). Use of native and exotic garden plants by suburban nectarivorous birds. Biol Conserv Biol, 2, 219-224.
  • Hartley, L., & Greene, T. (2008). Five minute bird count. Department of Conservation draft report January 2008.
  • Hobson, E., & Rempel, K. (2001). Designing research to advance the management of birds in urbanizning areas. Proceedings of the Fourth International Urban Wildlife Symposium, pp. 114-122.
  • Jokimaki, T. (1999). Artificial nest predation and abundance of birds along an urban gradient. Condor, 102, 838-847. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/102.4.838
  • Kuhn, I., Brandle, R., & Klotz, S. (2004). The flora of german cities is naturally species rich. Evol Ecol Res, 6, 749-764.
  • Landsberg, H. E. (1981). The urban climate. International Geophysics Series, 28, 275.
  • Marzluff, J. M., & Kern, E. (2001). Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: A general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restoration Ecology, 9, 280-292. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009003280.x
  • Matthews, R. H. (1999). On bird species diversity. Ecology, 42, 594-598. https://doi.org/10.2307/1932254
  • McDonnell, K. M. (2006). Spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern in response to urbanization. Landsc Urban Plan, 81, 341-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.009
  • McKinney, M. L. (2002). Urbanisation, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience, 52, 883-890. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2
  • Melles, S., Glenn, S., & Martin, K. (2003). Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: species - environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient Conservation Ecology, 7, 5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00478-070105
  • Mennechez, K. (2006). Riparian bird response to vegetation structure: a multiscale analysis using LiDAR measurements of canopy height. Ecol Appl, 19, 1848-1857. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1124.1
  • Miller, J. R., & Hobbs, R. J. (2002). Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol, 16, 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00420.x
  • Mills, A. J., McCain, C. M., & Palmer, M. (1989). Could temperature and water availability drive elevational species richness patterns? A global case study for bat. Global Ecol Biogeogr, 8, 13-20.
  • Pautasso, S. K. (2007). Intersepcific variation in avian blood parasites and haematology associated with urbanization in a desert habitat. J Avian Biol, 39, 300-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0908-8857.2008.04248.x
  • Prakash, M. K. (2012). Ecology diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landscape Urban Plan, 77, 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.01.004
  • Rebele, F. (1994). Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 4, 173-187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2997649
  • Rolstad, J. (1991). Consequences of forest fragmentation for the dynamics of bird populations: conceptual issues and the evidence. Biol J Linn Soc, 42, 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00557.x
  • Rosenstock, S. S., Anderson, D. R., Giesen, K. M., Leukering, T., & Carter, M. F. (2002). Landbird counting techniques current practices and an alternative. The Auk, 119, 46-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/119.1.46
  • Rothery, D. K. (1999). Bird communities and the structure of urban habitats. Can J Zool., 57, 2358-2368. https://doi.org/10.1139/z79-307
  • Savard, S. (2000). Relative abundance in bird populations. Am Nat., 112, 695-699. https://doi.org/10.1086/283311
  • Seaward, M. K. (1982). Responses of songbirds to magpie reduction in an urban habitat. J Wildll. Manage., 71, 2624-2631. https://doi.org/10.2193/2006-105
  • Shochat, A. (2004). What is the form of animal-species-richness relationship? A critical review and meta analysis. Ecology, 93, 2241-2252. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1861.1
  • Spurr, E. B. (2005). Monitoring bird populations in New Zealand: a workshop to assess the feasibility of a national bird population monitoring scheme. In C. Bezar (ed.), Landcare Research Science Series No 28. Lincoln.
  • Sruti, N. (2008). Ecological studies on house sparrow, Passer domesticus in the bharadvati town, Karnataka state, India (M.Sc. Dissertation), Kuvempu University, Shankarghatta, Karnataka, India.
  • Tanjong, E. (2014). Socio-economic survey of the villages of Mount Cameroon National Park (MCNP). Program for Sustainable Management of Natural Resources Cameroon – South-West Region, Buea, Cameroon, 117, 529-538.
  • Thompson, P. J. (1993). Bush, bugs and birds; interdependency in a farming landscape. Open J Ecol, 1(2) 9-23. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2011.12002
  • Walsh, S. A. (2006). New penguin remains from the Pliocene of Northern Chile. Hist Biol, 18(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912960600640796
  • Walters, R. J. (1970). Responses of songbirds to magpie reduction in an urban habitat. J Wildll Manage, 71, 2624-2631. https://doi.org/10.2193/2006-105
  • Wania, J. M., Valacarel, A., & Fernandez-Juricic, E. (2009). Antipredator strategies of house finches: Are urban habitats safe spots from predators even when humans are around? Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 63, 673-685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0701-6
  • Warren, P. S., Katti, M., Emran, M., & Brazel, A. (2006). Urban Bioacoustics: Its not just noise. Anim Behav, 71, 491-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.07.014
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.