Research Article

Virtual Coverboarding: Using Local Biodiverity to Engage Science Majors

Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2022, 18(4), e2279,
Publication date: Apr 15, 2022
Full Text (PDF)


There is a current need to develop engaging, informative online activities for science majors and potential future citizen scientists, particularly given the increase in the online teaching environment following COVID-19. Given this potential for online teaching to continue to increase, it becomes ever more essential to provide undergraduate students with methods that allow students to remotely access common methods used for sampling species while still engaging students in learning about local species diversity. This study assessed the potential for an interactive, online course-specific website to connect and inform first-year undergraduate biology majors (pre-health majors to environmental science) on local leaf litter species diversity. The website included species encountered as part of an ongoing on-campus biodiversity monitoring project using coverboards. Students navigated to the website, answered questions on the types of organisms, and completed a short survey. The survey questions reviewed whether the website was engaging and informed students on campus biodiversity of both reptiles and arthropods. Students overwhelmingly responded positively that the website was helpful to advise them on local species and their natural histories and engaged and piqued their interest. Therefore, we recommend incorporating course websites as teaching tools to catalog local species to teach undergraduate biology majors.


science education herpetology online biology technology


Unger, S. D., Merian, W. R., & Rollins, M. A. (2022). Virtual Coverboarding: Using Local Biodiverity to Engage Science Majors. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2279.
Unger, S. D., Merian, W. R., and Rollins, M. A. (2022). Virtual Coverboarding: Using Local Biodiverity to Engage Science Majors. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2279.
Unger SD, Merian WR, Rollins MA. Virtual Coverboarding: Using Local Biodiverity to Engage Science Majors. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(4):e2279.
Unger SD, Merian WR, Rollins MA. Virtual Coverboarding: Using Local Biodiverity to Engage Science Majors. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(4), e2279.
Unger, Shem D., William R. Merian, and Mark A. Rollins. "Virtual Coverboarding: Using Local Biodiverity to Engage Science Majors". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2022 18 no. 4 (2022): e2279.
Unger, Shem D. et al. "Virtual Coverboarding: Using Local Biodiverity to Engage Science Majors". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 18, no. 4, 2022, e2279.


  1. Alvarez, K. S. (2021). Using virtual simulations in online laboratory instruction and active learning exercises as a response to instructional challenges during COVID-19. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 22(1), 1-4.
  2. Annetta, L. A., Cheng, M., & Holmes, S. (2010). Assessing twenty-first century skills through a teacher created video game for high school biology students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(2), 101-114.
  3. Balke, M., Schmidt, S., Hausmann, A., Toussaint, E., Bergsten, J., Buffington, M., Hauser, C. L., Kroupa, A., Hagedorn, G., Riedel, A., Polaszek, A., Ubaidillah, R., Krogman, L., Zwick, A., Fikacek, M., Hajek, J., Michat, M., Dietrich, C., Salle, J., …, & Hobern, D. (2013). Biodiversity into your hands–A call for a virtual global natural history ‘metacollection’. Frontiers in Zoology, 10(1), 55.
  4. Bindis, M., & Currie, C. (2021). Becoming WISE about the environment: A novel approach to an overnight summer science camp for young females. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(2), e2233.
  5. Blake, M. R., & Morse, C. (2016). Keeping your options open: A review of open source and free technologies for instructional use in higher education. Reference Services Review, 44(3), 375-389.
  6. Brinson, J. R. (2017). A further characterization of empirical research related to learning outcome achievement in remote and virtual science labs. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 546-560.
  7. da Costa, R. B., de Sena, A. M., de Oliveira Sales, R., & da Costa Carpentieri, L. O. B. (2016). The efficiency of the online virtual platform in teaching animal genetics undergraduate course of Favet-Uece. Revista Brasileira de Higiene e Sanidade Animal [Brazilian Journal of Hygiene and Animal Sanity], 10(3), 310-329.
  8. Dean, S. N., & Gilbert, A. (2021). What scientist do: Engaging in science practices through a wonder-framed nature study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2255.
  9. Dustman, W. A., King-Keller, S., & Marquez, R. J. (2021). Development of gamified, interactive, low-cost, flexible virtual microbiology labs that promote higher-order thinking during pandemic instruction. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 22(1), 1-7.
  10. Ellwood, E. R., Sessa, J. A., Abraham, J. K., Budden, A. E., Douglas, N., Guralnick, R., Krimmel, E., Langen, T., Linton, D., Phillips, M., Soltis, P. S., Studer, M., White, L. D., Williams, J., & Monfils, A. K. (2020). Biodiversity science and twenty-first century workforce. Bioscience, 70(2), 119-121.
  11. Feynman, R. (1999). The value of science. In J. Robbins (Ed.), The pleasure of finding things out: The best short works of Richard Feynman (pp. 141-151). Perseus/Helix Books.
  12. Frailich, M., Kesner, M., & Hofstein, A. (2007). The influence of web-based chemistry learning on students’ perceptions, attitudes, and achievements. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(2), 179-197.
  13. Gilman, S. L. (2006). Do online labs work? An assessment of an online lab on cell division. American Biology Teacher, 68, e131-e134.
  14. Hampton, P. (2007). A comparison of the success of artificial cover types for capturing amphibians and reptiles. Amphibia-Reptilia, 28(3), 433-437.
  15. Harris, B. N., McCarthy, P. C., Wright, A. M., Schutz, H., Boersma, K. S., Shepherd, S. L., Manning, L. A., Malisch, J. L., & Ellington, R. M. (2020). From panic to pedagogy: Using online active learning to promote inclusive instruction in ecology and evolutionary biology courses and beyond. Ecology and Evolution, 10(22), 12581-12612.
  16. Ibit, M. G. B., Botona, L. M. P., Dalida, M. C. B., Iledan, G. A. G., Ranigo, K. G., & Lopez, M. J. D. (2021). Laborapparatus: A student guide website about laboratory apparatus. Journal of Ethics and Diversity in International Communication, 1(2), 19-25.
  17. Jones, T., & Laughlin, T. (2009). Learning to measure biodiversity: Two agent-based models that simulate sampling methods & provide data for calculating diversity indices. The American Biology Teacher, 71(7), 406-410.
  18. Lee, J., Lee, I., & Kwon, Y. (2011). Scan & learn! Use of quick response codes & smartphones in a biology field study. The American Biology Teacher, 73(8), 485-492.
  19. Leksono, S. M., Marianingsih, P., Ilman, E. N., & Maryani, N. (2021). Online learning media on biological conservation: Rawa Danau nature reserve website. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(8), 87-100.
  20. Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Systems, 38(3), Article 7.
  21. Maldarelli, G. A., Hartmann, E. M., Cummings, P. J., Horner, R. D., Obom, K. M., Shingles, R., & Pearlan, R. S. (2009). Virtual lab demonstrations improve students’ mastery of basic biology laboratory techniques. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 10(1), 51-57.
  22. McConnell, W., Howard, M., & Catania, K. (2020). The Downstream Collaborative Project: A school-university partnership inspires collaboration through a meaningful watershed educational experience. Science and Children, 57, 59-65.
  23. Monfils, A. K., Powers, K. E., Marshall, C. J., Martine, C. T., Smith, J. F., & Prather, L. A. (2017). Natural history collections: Teaching about biodiversity across time, space, and digital platforms. Southeastern Naturalist, 16(10), 47-57.
  24. Myers, P., Espinosa, R., Parr, C. S., Jones, T., Hammond, G. S., & Dewey, T. A. (2013). The animal diversity web.
  25. Novacek, M. J. (2008). Engaging the public in biodiversity issues. PNAS, 105, 11571-11678.
  26. Palmberg, I., Berg, I., Karkkainen, S., Norrgard-Silanpaa, P., Persson, C., Vikonis, R., & Yli-Panula, E. (2015). Nordic-Baltic student teachers’ identification and of interest in plant and animal species: The importance of species identification and biodiversity for sustainable development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(6), 549-571.
  27. Paradise, C., & Bartkovich, L. (2021). Integrating citizen science with online biological collections to promote species and biodiversity literacy in an entomology course. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 61(1), 1-13.
  28. Peat, M. (2000). Towards first year biology online: A virtual learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 3(3), 203-207.
  29. Salas, J. C., & Barquero, M. D. (2021). Biological inventory at a university campus using ICT and citizen science participation. Journal of Ecotourism, 20(3), 301-307.
  30. Sepulveda-Escobar, P., & Morrison, A. (2020). Online teaching placement during COVID-19 pandemic in Chile: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Teaching Education, 43(4), 587-607.
  31. Stuckey-Mickell, T., & Stuckey-Danner, B. D. (2007). Virtual labs in the online biology course: Student perceptions of effectiveness and usability. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 105-111.
  32. Tomasek, T., Matthews, C., & Hall, J. (2005). What’s slithering around your school grounds? The American Biology Teacher, 67(7), 419-425.[0419:WSAOYS]2.0.CO;2
  33. Varty, A. K. (2016). Options for online undergraduate courses in biology at American colleges and universities. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), ar58.
  34. Vo, M. K., & Sharp, J. C. (2019). Design, development, and content creation for an open education physics website for MRT education. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 50(2), 212-219.
  35. White, E., Basford, L., Birch, S., Black, A., Culham, A., McGoff, H., Lundqvist, K., Oppenheimer, P., Tanner, J., Wells, M., & Mauchline, A. (2015). Creating and implementing a biodiversity recording app for teaching and research in environmental studies. The Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 1(1), 1-8.
  36. Whittaker, A. L., Howarth, G. S., & Lymn, K. A. (2014). Evaluation of Facebook© to create online learning community in an undergraduate animal science class. Educational Media International, 51(2), 135-145.
  37. Yahnke, C. J., Dewey, T., & Myers, P. (2013). Animal diversity web as a teaching & learning tool to improve research & writing skills in college biology courses. The American Biology Teacher, 75(7), 494-498.
  38. Yli-Panula, E., Jeronen, E., Lemmetty, P., & Pauna, A. (2018). Teaching methods in biology promoting biodiversity education. Sustainability, 10(10), 3812.


Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.