Research Article

Examining Students’ Spatial Ability and Its Impact on the Learning of Stereochemistry

Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2022, 18(4), e2288,
Publication date: May 18, 2022
Full Text (PDF)


The subject of stereochemistry in considered a difficult concept in organic chemistry because of its dependence on spatial ability. The challenges that students face in learning about stereochemistry can lead to poor performance and alternative conceptions, which in turn might hinder their progresses in various science and engineering academic careers. Development of successful conceptual understanding to solve stereochemistry related problems requires that students have a thorough understanding of the various types of spatial abilities in stereochemistry such as mental rotation and visualization of three-dimensional chemical molecules. This research project of the City College of New York (a minority serving, public, urban, and commuter institution) investigates some of the challenges that students face and approaches that students rely on to solve stereochemistry related problems and the role of spatial ability in the learning process. Likert-type surveys, spatial ability tests, and various open-ended questions were used to assess the understandings of 86 participants. The data indicated that one of barriers to learning about stereochemistry is the students’ inabilities to mentally rotate and visualize three-dimensional molecular structures by looking at their chemical formulae, assigning priority functional groups, determining configurations, and remembering the various rules that are necessary for solving stereochemistry related questions. Spatial ability was found to be one of the factors for success in stereochemistry, and majority of the students believe that with practice and the use of three-dimensional molecular modeling kits, they can improve their spatial abilities in stereochemistry.


spatial ability stereochemistry organic chemistry


Salame, I. I., & Kabir, S. A. (2022). Examining Students’ Spatial Ability and Its Impact on the Learning of Stereochemistry. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2288.
Salame, I. I., and Kabir, S. A. (2022). Examining Students’ Spatial Ability and Its Impact on the Learning of Stereochemistry. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2288.
Salame II, Kabir SA. Examining Students’ Spatial Ability and Its Impact on the Learning of Stereochemistry. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(4):e2288.
Salame II, Kabir SA. Examining Students’ Spatial Ability and Its Impact on the Learning of Stereochemistry. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(4), e2288.
Salame, Issa I., and Sheikh Aleena Kabir. "Examining Students’ Spatial Ability and Its Impact on the Learning of Stereochemistry". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2022 18 no. 4 (2022): e2288.
Salame, Issa I. et al. "Examining Students’ Spatial Ability and Its Impact on the Learning of Stereochemistry". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 18, no. 4, 2022, e2288.


  1. Alt, D., & Boniel-Nissim, M. (2018). Links between adolescents deep and surface learning approaches, problematic internet use, and fear of missing out (FoMO). Internet Interventions, 13, 30-39.
  2. Barnea, N., & Dori, Y. J. (1999). High school chemistry students’ performance and gender differences in a computerized molecular modeling learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(4), 257-271.
  3. Barrett, T. J., & Hegarty, M. (2016). Effects of interface and spatial ability on manipulation of virtual models in a STEM domain. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 220-231.
  4. Berney, S., Bétrancourt, M., Molinari, G., & Hoyek, N. (2015). How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models. Anatomical Sciences Education, 8(5), 452-462.
  5. Bilge, A. R., & Taylor, H. A. (2016). Framing the figure: Mental rotation revisited in light of cognitive strategies. Memory & Cognition, 45(1), 63-80.
  6. Carter, C. S., LaRussa, M. A., & Bodner, G. M. (1987). A study of two measures of spatial ability as predictors of success in different levels of general chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(7), 645-657.
  7. Chien, K.-P., Tsai, C.-Y., Chen, H.-L., Chang, W.-H., & Chen, S. (2015). Learning differences and eye fixation patterns in virtual and physical science laboratories. Computers & Education, 82, 191-201.
  8. Dawson, C. (2019). Tackling Limited Spatial Ability: Lowering One Barrier into STEM? European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 14-31.
  9. Dominguez, M. G., Gutierrez, J. M., Gonzalez, C. R., & Corredeaguas, C. M. M. (2012). Methodologies and tools to improve spatial ability, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 736-744.
  10. Dori, Y. J., & Barak. M. (2001). Virtual and physical molecular modeling: Fostering model perception and spatial understanding. Educational Technology & Society, 4(1), 61-74.
  11. Dori, Y. J., Barak, M., & Adir, N. (2003). A web-based chemistry course as a means to foster freshmen learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(9), 1084-1092.
  12. Ferguson, A. M., Maloney, E. A., Fugelsang, J., & Risko, E. F. (2015). On the relation between math and spatial ability: The case of math anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 1-12.
  13. Ferk, V., Vrtacnik, M., Blejec, A., & Gril, A. (2003). Students understanding of molecular structure representations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(10), 1227-1245.
  14. Furio, C., Calatayud, M. L., Barcenas, S. L., & Padilla, O. M. (2000). Functional fixedness and functional reduction as common sense reasonings in chemical equilibrium and in geometry and polarity of molecules. Science Education, 84(5), 545-565.<545::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-1
  15. Harle, M., & Towns, M. (2011). A review of spatial ability literature, its connection to chemistry, and implications for instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(3), 351-360.
  16. Harris, P. A. (2019). Spatializing an undergraduate chemistry curriculum: Action research to assist students with low visual-spatial ability [Ed.D. dissertation, Northcentral University].
  17. Hauptman, H., & Cohen, A. (2011). The synergetic effect of learning styles on the interaction between virtual environments and the enhancement of spatial thinking. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2106-2117.
  18. Hausmann, M., Slabbekoorn, D., Goozen, S. H. M. V., Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., & Gunturkun, O. (2000). Sex hormones affect spatial abilities during the menstrual cycle. Behavioral Neuroscience, 114(6), 1245-1250.
  19. Hegarty, M. (2014). Spatial thinking in undergraduate science education. Spatial Cognition and Computation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(2), 142-167.
  20. Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual‐spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 684‐689.
  21. Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2011). The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations–Evidence for an ability-as-compensator hypothesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 209-216.
  22. Jansen, P., & Heil, M. (2009). Gender differences in mental rotation across adulthood. Experimental Aging Research, 36(1), 94-104.
  23. Jirout, J. J., & Newcombe, N. S. (2015). Building blocks for developing spatial skills. Evidence from a large, representative U.S. sample. Psychological Science, 26(3), 302‐310.
  24. José, T. J., & Williamson, V. M. (2008). The effects of a two-year molecular visualization experience on teachers attitudes, content knowledge, and spatial ability. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(5), 718.
  25. Krajcik, J. S. (1991). Developing students’ understanding of chemical concepts. In Y. S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yanny, & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science: International perspective on the psychological foundations of technology-based learning environments (pp. 117-145). Erlbaum.
  26. Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2013). A meta‐analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue spatial visualization tests: Visualization of rotations (PSVT: R). Educational Psychology Review, 25 (1), 69-94.
  27. Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C. E., Añorbe-Díaz, B., & González-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 469-486.
  28. Meneghetti, C., Cardillo, R., Mammarella, I. C., Caviola, S., & Borella, E. (2016). The role of practice and strategy in mental rotation training: Transfer and maintenance effects. Psychological Research, 81(2), 415-431.
  29. Moè, A. (2016). Does experience with spatial school subjects favour girls mental rotation performance? Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 11-16.
  30. Mohler, J. L. (2009). Computer graphics education: Where and how do we develop spatial ability? In Proceedings of Eurographics (pp. 79-86). Lausanne, Switzerland.
  31. Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-196.
  32. Oliver-Hoyo, M., & Babilonia-Rosa, M. A. (2017). Promotion of spatial skills in chemistry and biochemistry education at the college level. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(8), 996-1006.
  33. Paivio, A. (1986) Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
  34. Peters, M. (2005). Sex differences and the factor of time in solving Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotation problems. Brain and Cognition, 57(2), 176-184.
  35. Pribyl, J. R., & Bodner, G. M. (1987). Spatial ability and its role in organic chemistry: A study of four organic courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(3), 229-240.
  36. Rodán, A., Contreras, M. J., Elosúa, M. R., & Gimeno, P. (2016). Experimental but not sex differences of a mental rotation training program on adolescents. Frontiers of Psychology, 7(1050), 1‐12.
  37. Rohde, T. E., & Thompson, L. A. (2007). Predicting academic achievement with cognitive ability. Intelligence, 35, 83‐92.
  38. Sadoski, M. Goetze, T. & Fritz, J. B. (1993) Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 291-304.
  39. Sadoski, M., Paivio, A., & Goetze, T. (1991). A critique of schema theory in reading and a dual coding alternative. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 463-485.
  40. Sorby, S., Casey, B., Veurink, N., & Dulaney, A. (2013). The role of spatial training in improving spatial and calculus performance in engineering students. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 20-29.
  41. Spearman, C. E. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement. Macmillan.
  42. Stieff, M. (2007). Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 219-234.
  43. Stieff, M., Lira, M., & Sesutter, D. (2014). Representational competence and spatial thinking in STEM. In Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 987-991).
  44. Stieff, M., Ryu, M., Dixon, B., & Hegarty, M. (2012). The role of spatial ability and strategy preference for spatial problem solving in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(7), 854-859.
  45. Tarampi, M. R., Heydari, N., & Hegarty, M. (2016). A tale of two types of perspective taking. Psychological Science, 27(11), 1507-1516.
  46. Terlecki, M., Newcombe, N., & Little, M. (2008). Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 996-1013.
  47. Tuckey, H., & Salvaratnam, M. (1993). Studies involving three-dimensional visualization skills in chemistry: A review. Studies in Science Education, 21(1), 99-121.
  48. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599-604.
  49. Voyer, D., Voyer, S. & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta‐analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250‐270.
  50. Wu, H.-K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88(3), 465-492.
  51. Yang, E.-M., Andre, T., Greenbowe, T. J., & Tibell, L. (2003). Spatial ability and the impact of visualization/animation on learning electrochemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 329-349.
  52. Yuan, L., Kong, F., Luo, Y., Zeng, S., Lan, J., & You, X. (2019). Gender differences in large-scale and small-scale spatial ability: A systematic review based on behavioral and neuroimaging research. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 128.


Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.