Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education

• Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C., Eds. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman.
• Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J., & Shavelson, R. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194
• Boeren, E. (2019). Understanding sustainable development goal (SDG) 4 on “quality education” from micro, meso and macro perspectives. International Review of Education, 65, 277-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09772-7
• Borg, C., Gericke, N., Höglund, H.-O., & Bergman, E. (2012). The barriers encountered by teachers implementing education for sustainable development: Discipline bound differences and teaching traditions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(2), 185-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.699891
• Broncano, F. (2014). Daring to believe: Metacognition, epistemic agency, and reflective knowledge. In A. Fairweather (Ed.), Virtue epistemology naturalized: Bridges between virtue epistemology and philosophy of science (pp. 49-66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04672-3_4
• Burroughs, N., Gardner, J., Lee, Y., Guo, S., Touitou, I., Jansen, K., & Schmidt, W. (2019). A review of the literature on teacher effectiveness and student outcomes. In Teaching for excellence and equity. In N. Burroughs, J. Gardner, Y. Lee, S. Guo, I. Touitou, K. Jansen, & W. Schmidt (Eds.), Analyzing teacher characteristics, behaviors, and student outcomes with TIMSS. IEA research for education, vol 6 (pp. 7-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16151-4_2
• Cole, M. J. (2023). Evaluative thinking. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 23(2), 70-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X231163932
• de Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3102_2
• Dempster, E. R. (2023). What is ‘powerful knowledge’ in school biology? Journal of Biological Education57(2), 245-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2023.2190269
• Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of teaching. Hold, Rinehart, & Winston.
• Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633
• European Parliament. (2023). Environment policy: General principles and basic framework. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/erpl-app-public/factsheets/pdf/en/FTU_2.5.1.pdf
• Fischer, A., Havu-Nuutinen, S., Kontkanen, S., & Suortti, E. (2024). Investigating sustainability education in the science capital teaching approach: Competence development and pillar considerations. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 20(4), Article e2418. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/15038
• Fitriah, E., Munadi, S., & Djukri. (2018). Understanding of pre-service biology teachers students toward pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, Article 012041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012041
• FNBE. (2016). The national core curriculum for basic education. Finnish National Board of Education.
• García-Fortes, M. Á., Banos-González, I., & Esteve-Guirao, P. (2024). ESD action competencies of future teachers: Self-perception and competence profile analysis. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 25(8), 1558-1580. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2023-0323
• Gudmundsdottir, S., & Shulman, L. S. (1987). Pedagogical content knowledge in social studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 31(2), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383870310201
• Hansson, S. O. (2021). Science and pseudo-science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
• Hattie, J. (2011). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses related to achievement. International Review of Education, 57, 219-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-011-9198-8
• Hudson, B., Gericke, N., Olin-Scheller, C., & Stolare, M. (2023). Trajectories of powerful knowledge and epistemic quality: Analysing the transformations from disciplines across school subjects. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 55(2), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2182164
• Jeronen, E. (2023). Sustainable education. In S. O. Idowu, R. Schmidpeter, N. Capaldi, L. Zu, M. Del Baldo, & R. Abreu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sustainable management(pp. 3488-3497). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25984-5_237
• Kapon, S., Laherto, A., & Levrini, O. (2018). Disciplinary authenticity and personal relevance in school science. Science Education, 102(5), 1077-1106. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21458
• Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112460398
• Kleickmann, T., Tröbst, S., Heinze, A., Bernholt, A., Rink, R., & Kunter, M. (2017). Teacher knowledge experiment: Conditions of the development of pedagogical content knowledge. In D. Leutner, J. Fleischer, J. Grünkorn, & E. Klieme (Eds.), Competence assessment in education, methodology of educational measurement and assessment (pp. 111-129). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50030-0_8
• Koster, B., & Dengerink, J. (2008). Professional standards for teacher educators: How to deal with complexity, ownership, and function. Experiences from the Netherlands. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760802000115
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
• Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. SAGE.
• Laghari, M. A., Chachar, Z. A., & Bachal, S. (2023). An overview of the influence of teachers’ subject matter knowledge on students’ academic achievement. Journal of Academic Research for Humanities, 3(3), 252-258A.
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 33(2), 363-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529786
• LOMLOE. (2020). Ley orgánica 3/2020, de 29 de Diciembre, por la que se modifica la ley orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de Mayo, de educación [Organic law 3/2020, of December 29, amending organic law 2/2006, of May 3, on education]. BOE, 340, 122868-122953.
• Lutovac, S., & Körkkö, M. (2024). ‘A teacher’s work is many things, but one thing it is not is easy’: Pre-service teachers’ conceptions of teachers’ work. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2024.2388630
• Metsäpelto, R.-L., Poikkeus, A.-M., Heikkilä, M., Husu, J., Laine, A., Lappalainen, K., Lähteenmäki, M., Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., Warinowski, A., Iiskala, T., Hangelin, S., Harmoinen, S., Holmström, A., Kyrö-Ämmälä, O., Lehesvuori, S., Mankki, V., & Suvilehto, P. (2022). A multidimensional adapted process model of teaching. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 34(2), 143-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09373-9
• Michaelis, C. (2017). Kompetenzentwicklung zum nachhaltigen Wirtschaften. Eine Längsschnittstudie in der kaufmännischen Ausbildung [Developing skills for sustainable business practices: A longitudinal study in commercial education.]. Peter-Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b10896
• Muller, J., & Young, M. (2019). Knowledge, power, and powerful knowledge re-visited. The Curriculum Journal, 30(2), 196-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1570292
• Newman, I. (2000). A conceptualization of mixed methods: A need for inductive/deductive approach to conducting research. In Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
• OECD. (2021). OECD environmental performance reviews: Finland 2021. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d73547b7-en
• Osborne, J., Rafanelli, S., & Kind, P. (2018). Toward a more coherent model for science education than the crosscutting concepts of the next generation science standards: The affordances of styles of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 962-981. https://doi.org/10.1002/ea.21460
• Palmberg, I., Berg, I., Jeronen, E., Kärkkäinen, S., Norrgård-Sillanpää, P., Persson, C., Vilkonis, R., & Yli-Panula, E. (2015). Nordic-Baltic student teachers’ identification of and interest in plant and animal species–The importance of species identification and biodiversity for sustainable development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(6), 549-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9438-z
• Palmberg, I., Jonsson, G., Jeronen, E., & Yli-Panula, E. (2016). Blivande lärares uppfattningar och förståelse av baskunskap i ekologi i Danmark, Finland och Sverige [Prospective teachers’ perceptions and understanding of basic knowledge in ecology in Denmark, Finland and Sweden]. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 12(2), 197-217. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.2557
• Park, S., & Oliver, S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
• Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219-225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_3
• Prabakaran, M. (2020). Historical appropriation of epistemological values: A goal ahead for higher education. Higher Education for the Future, 7(1), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631119886416
• Puig, B., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2022). Critical thinking in biology and environmental education: Facing challenges in a post-truth world. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92006-7
• Roberts, D., & Bybee, R. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, volume II (pp. 559-572). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267-38
• Rockström, J., & Sukhdev, P. (2016). The SDGs wedding cake. Stockholm Resilience Center. https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-news/2016-06-14-how-food-connects-all-the-sdgs.html
• Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin III, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton,T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza R., Scedin, ... Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472-475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a
• Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. The Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842-866. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00181
• Rosenkränzer, F., Kramer, T., Hörsch, C., Schuler, S., & Rieß, W. (2016). Promoting student teachers’ content related knowledge in teaching systems thinking: Measuring effects of an intervention through evaluating a videotaped lesson. Higher Education Studies, 6(4), 156-169. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v6n4p156
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues. A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
• Sarkar, M., Gutierrez-Bucheli, L., Yip, S. Y., Lazarus, M., Wright, C., White, P. J., Ilic, D., Hiscox, T. J., & Berry, A. (2024). Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in higher education: A systematic scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 144, Article 104608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104608
• Schön, D. A. (1992). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473
• Schwab, J. J. (1978). Science, curriculum and liberal education. University of Chicago Press.
• Seeber, S., Michaelis, C., Repp, A., Hartig, J., Aichele, C., Schumann, M., Anke, J. M., Dierkes, S., & Siepelmeyer, D. (2019). Assessment of competences in sustainability management: Analyses to the construct dimensionality. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 33(2), 148-158. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000240
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
• Sinatra, G. M., & Hofer, B. K. (2021). Science denial: Why it happens and what to do about it. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190944681.001.0001
• Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of bildung. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, & D. R. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education. Innovations in science education and technology (pp. 65-88). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_4
• Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change. Green Books.
• Sterling, S. (2008). Sustainable education–Towards a deep learning response to unsustainability. Policy & Practice. A Development Education Review, 6, 63-68. https://www.developmenteducationreview.com/issue/issue-6/sustainable-education-towards-deep-learning-response-unsustainability
• Tallman, M. A. (2023). What makes pedagogical content knowledge “pedagogical”? Reconnecting PCK to its Deweyan foundations. The Mathematics Educator, 31(1), 100-128. https://doi.org/10.63301/tme.v31i1.2852
• Tuomi, J., & Sarajärvi, A. (2018). Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi [Qualitative research and content analysis]. Kustannusosakeyhtiö Tammi.
• Uitto, A., & Saloranta, S. (2017). Subject teachers as educators for sustainability: Survey study. Education Sciences, 7(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010008
• Valverde-Pérez, M., Esteve-Guirao, P., & Banos-González, I. (2022). How do prospective teachers address pupils’ ideas during school practices? Educational Sciences, 12(11), Article 783. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110783
• Yli-Panula, E., Jeronen, E., & Mäki, S. (2022). School culture promoting sustainability in student teachers’ views. Sustainability, 14(12), Article 7440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127440
• Yli-Panula, E., Jeronen, E., Seiko-Ahlström, H., & Ruotsalainen, E. (2017). Important biological issues for elementary pupils–A study of elementary pre-service teachers’ conceptions. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 13(2), 180-196. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.2579
• Young, M., & Muller, J. 2013. On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1(3), 229-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3017
• Young, M., Lambert, D., Roberts, C. R., & Roberts, M. (2014). Knowledge and the future school: Curriculum and social justice. Bloomsbury.

APA

Yli-Panula, E., Banos-Gonzalez, I., Jeronen, E., & Matikainen, E. (2025). Student teachers’ views on content knowledge of environmental issues in biological and geoscience subject matters. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 21(4), e2520. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/17442

Vancouver

Yli-Panula E, Banos-Gonzalez I, Jeronen E, Matikainen E. Student teachers’ views on content knowledge of environmental issues in biological and geoscience subject matters. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2025;21(4):e2520. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/17442

AMA

Yli-Panula E, Banos-Gonzalez I, Jeronen E, Matikainen E. Student teachers’ views on content knowledge of environmental issues in biological and geoscience subject matters. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2025;21(4), e2520. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/17442

Chicago

Yli-Panula, Eija, Isabel Banos-Gonzalez, Eila Jeronen, and Eila Matikainen. "Student teachers’ views on content knowledge of environmental issues in biological and geoscience subject matters". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2025 21 no. 4 (2025): e2520. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/17442

Harvard

Yli-Panula, E., Banos-Gonzalez, I., Jeronen, E., and Matikainen, E. (2025). Student teachers’ views on content knowledge of environmental issues in biological and geoscience subject matters. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 21(4), e2520. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/17442

MLA

Yli-Panula, Eija et al. "Student teachers’ views on content knowledge of environmental issues in biological and geoscience subject matters". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 21, no. 4, 2025, e2520. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/17442