INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SCIENCE EDUCATION
Review Article

Teaching Evolution as the Unifying Theory of Biology via a University Course: Re-Count of a Praxis

Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2022, 18(4), e2275, https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11976
Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The aim of the presentation is to discuss the findings of a series of research projects that we have been carried out with various groups of students in the University of Athens and concern the teaching of biology by means of evolution through natural selection (THES). In the article it is discussed the conclusions after teaching a biology course based on evolution as the unifying theory, while at the same time more general issues are raised: Is it, for example, a realistic goal to teach biology by means of this kind of teaching? Secondly, what is the usefulness of such a perspective. Which was studied by quantitative and qualitative studies on the conceptual ecology (CE) of the evolution of Greek students. The latter showed the value of this kind of approach in the acceptance and understanding of the THES, as part of students’ CI. Thirdly, ccomparative studies with beginners and advanced students in terms of evolution education showed, that, merely teaching evolution within a course, even if the latter is based on the THES, it is not enough to make someone in-depth connoisseur. It seems that to be acquainted with it to more depth the learners need to go through two stages: in the first, they may move from the stage of owing Aristotelian views of the issue, i.e., from typology, to the early “Darwinian” ones. And they need to go through a second one, where via, in-depth educational training, they might move to the next, namely, the population view of thinking.

KEYWORDS

evolution teaching unifying theory conceptual ecology typology population view

CITATION (APA)

Athanasiou, K. (2022). Teaching Evolution as the Unifying Theory of Biology via a University Course: Re-Count of a Praxis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2275. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11976
Harvard
Athanasiou, K. (2022). Teaching Evolution as the Unifying Theory of Biology via a University Course: Re-Count of a Praxis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2275. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11976
Vancouver
Athanasiou K. Teaching Evolution as the Unifying Theory of Biology via a University Course: Re-Count of a Praxis. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(4):e2275. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11976
AMA
Athanasiou K. Teaching Evolution as the Unifying Theory of Biology via a University Course: Re-Count of a Praxis. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(4), e2275. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11976
Chicago
Athanasiou, Kyriacos. "Teaching Evolution as the Unifying Theory of Biology via a University Course: Re-Count of a Praxis". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2022 18 no. 4 (2022): e2275. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11976
MLA
Athanasiou, Kyriacos "Teaching Evolution as the Unifying Theory of Biology via a University Course: Re-Count of a Praxis". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 18, no. 4, 2022, e2275. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11976

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 952-978. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10053
  2. Athanasiou, K., & Mavrikaki, E. (2013). Conceptual inventory of natural selection as a tool for measuring Greek university students’ evolution knowledge–Differences between novice and advanced students. International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.856529
  3. Athanasiou, K., & Papadopoulou, P. (2011). Conceptual ecology of the evolution acceptance among Greek education students: Knowledge, religious practices and social influences. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 903-924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.586072
  4. Athanasiou, K., Katakos, E., & Papadopoulou P. (2012) Conceptual ecology of the evolution acceptance among Greek education students: What is the contribution of knowledge increase? Journal of Biological Education, 46(4), 234-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2012.716780
  5. Ayala, F. J. (2000). Theodosius Dobzhansky: A man for all seasons. Resonance, 5, 48-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02836841
  6. Cho, M. H., Lankford, D. M., & Wescott, D. J. (2011). Exploring the relationships among epistemological beliefs, nature of science, and conceptual change in the learning of evolutionary theory. Evolution and Education Outreach, 4(2), 313-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-011-0324-7[KA1]
  7. Cummins, C. L., & Remsen, J. V. Jr. (1992). The importance of distinguishing ultimate from proximate causation in the teaching and learning of biology [Paper presentation]. The Second International Conference for History and Philosophy of Science in Science Teaching, Queen’s University at Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  8. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray.
  9. Demastes-Southerland, S., Good, R., & Peebles, P. (1995). Students’ conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change in evolution. Science Education, 79, 637-666. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790605
  10. Deniz, H., Donnelly, L., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 420-443. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20223
  11. Dobzhansky, T. (1937). Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press.
  12. Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125-129. https://doi.org/10.2307/4444260
  13. Dorion, K. (2010). A defense of constructivism as scientific enquiry in science education. Teacher Development, 14(4), 549-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2010.533496
  14. Driver, R. (1985). Children’s ideas in science. McGraw-Hill Education.
  15. Flint, J., Hill, A., Bowden, D. K., Oppenheimer, S. J., Sill, P. R., Serjeantson, S. W., Bana-Koiri, J., Bhatia, K., Alpers, M. P., Boyce, A. J., Weatherall, D. J., & Clegg, J. B. High frequencies of α-thalassaemia are the result of natural selection by malaria. Nature, 321, 744-750. https://doi.org/10.1038/321744a0[KA2]
  16. Frasier, T. R., & Roderick, C. (2011). Improving how evolution is taught: Facilitating a shift from memorization to evolutionary thinking. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4, 298-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-011-0327-4
  17. Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2008). Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations. Science & Education, 17, 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9075-9
  18. Kindi, V. (2005). The relation of history of science to philosophy of science in the structure of scientific revolutions and Kuhn’s later philosophical work. Perspectives on Science, 13(4), 495-530. https://doi.org/10.1162/106361405775466117
  19. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press. [KA3] https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001
  20. Lazaridis, G., Mavrikaki, E., & Athanasiou, K. (2011). Investigating the level of knowledge and understanding of evolution through natural selection of Greek biology and education students. In Proceedings of the 7th Panhellenic Conference of Science Education and ICT in Education (pp. 406-413). http://www.enephet.gr/library/praktika/2011-b-praktika.pdf
  21. Mantelas, N., & Mavrikaki, E. (2020). Religiosity and students’ acceptance of evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 42(18), 3071-3092. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1851066
  22. Mayr, E. (1959). Darwin and the evolution theory in biology. In B. J. Meggers (Ed.), Evolution and anthropology: A centennial appraisal (pp. 1-10). The Anthropological Society of Washington.
  23. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Belknap Press: An Imprint of Harvard University Press.
  24. National Association of Biology Teachers. (1995). NABT position statement on teaching evolution. News & Views. https://nabt.org/Position-Statements-NABT-Position-Statement-on-Teaching-Evolution
  25. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academies Press.
  26. Papadopoulou, P., Stasinakis, P., & Athanasiou, K. (2010). Study of evolution theory teaching: Students’ conceptual ecologies and teachers’ perceptions. In A. Yarden, & G. S. Carvalho (Eds.), Authenticity in biology education: Benefits and challenges (pp. 271-283).
  27. Piaget, J. (1957). Construction of reality in the child. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  28. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
  29. Provine, W. G. (1971). The origins of theoretical population genetics. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330390237
  30. Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (1999). The development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 99(1), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17441.x
  31. Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (2000). Science and high school biology teachers: Critical relationships. American Biology Teacher, 62, 23-31. https://doi.org/10.2307/4450822
  32. Strike, K., & Posner, G. I. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl, & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147-176). State University of New York Press.
  33. UoA. (2013). Site for electronic survey. University of Athens. https://survey.uoa.gr/manage/

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.