Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education

The Effect of Argumentation-Based Science Teaching Approach on 8th Graders’ Learning in the Subject of Acids-Bases, their Attitudes towards Science Class and Scientific Process Skills
Evrim Ural 1 * , Durdu Mehmet Gençoğlan 1
More Detail
1 Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, TURKEY
* Corresponding Author
Research Article

Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2020 - Volume 16 Issue 1, Article No: e02207
https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6369

Published Online: 16 Dec 2019

Views: 157 | Downloads: 147

How to cite this article
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Ural & Gençoğlan, 2020)
Reference: Ural, E., & Gençoğlan, D. M. (2020). The Effect of Argumentation-Based Science Teaching Approach on 8th Graders’ Learning in the Subject of Acids-Bases, their Attitudes towards Science Class and Scientific Process Skills. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(1), e02207. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6369
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Ural E, Gençoğlan DM. The Effect of Argumentation-Based Science Teaching Approach on 8th Graders’ Learning in the Subject of Acids-Bases, their Attitudes towards Science Class and Scientific Process Skills. Int J Env Sci Ed. 2020;16(1):e02207. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6369
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Ural E, Gençoğlan DM. The Effect of Argumentation-Based Science Teaching Approach on 8th Graders’ Learning in the Subject of Acids-Bases, their Attitudes towards Science Class and Scientific Process Skills. Int J Env Sci Ed. 2020;16(1), e02207. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6369
Chicago
In-text citation: (Ural and Gençoğlan, 2020)
Reference: Ural, Evrim, and Durdu Mehmet Gençoğlan. "The Effect of Argumentation-Based Science Teaching Approach on 8th Graders’ Learning in the Subject of Acids-Bases, their Attitudes towards Science Class and Scientific Process Skills". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2020 16 no. 1 (2020): e02207. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6369
Harvard
In-text citation: (Ural and Gençoğlan, 2020)
Reference: Ural, E., and Gençoğlan, D. M. (2020). The Effect of Argumentation-Based Science Teaching Approach on 8th Graders’ Learning in the Subject of Acids-Bases, their Attitudes towards Science Class and Scientific Process Skills. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(1), e02207. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6369
MLA
In-text citation: (Ural and Gençoğlan, 2020)
Reference: Ural, Evrim et al. "The Effect of Argumentation-Based Science Teaching Approach on 8th Graders’ Learning in the Subject of Acids-Bases, their Attitudes towards Science Class and Scientific Process Skills". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 16, no. 1, 2020, e02207. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6369
ABSTRACT
Studies show that there are difficulties in learning the subject of acids and bases. For this reason, in the scope of the study, case studies which use daily life context are used to help students to establish the relation between acid-bases and daily life. In the content of the study, it was aimed to provide hands-on learning opportunities with performing experiments in the laboratory. It was thought that argument based science learning supported with authentic case studies would facilitate the students to learn the concepts of acid and base and support the development of their scientific process skills. The study aimed to investigate the effect of argumentation-based science teaching approach on 8th graders’ learning of the subject of acids and bases, their attitudes towards science class and their scientific process skills. The sample of the study consisted of 69 8th grade students from two different classes attending Science and Technology Course at a government school. The quasi-experimental research design which is one of the quantitative research designs was used in the content of the study. The experimental group was taught through Argumentation Based Science Learning Approach and the control group was taught through didactic teaching approach. The academic achievement test for the subject of acids and bases, Science Class Attitude Scale and Science Process Skills test were administered as pre-test prior to the application and post test following to the application. The results revealed that the argumentation based science teaching approach was more effective than the didactic teaching approach while learning the subject of acids and bases. The findings displayed that the academic achievement of the students taught with argumentation based approach was higher than the ones taught with didactic teaching approach. The findings of the study displayed that the Argumentation Based Science Learning Effect had no significant effect on students’ attitudes towards science class. But the approach had a significant effect on students’ science process skills.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
  • Aikenhead, G. (2001). Integrating western and aboriginal sciences: Cross-cultural science teaching. Research in Science Teaching, 31, 337-355. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013151709605
  • Akkus, R., Gunel, M., & Hand, B. (2007). Comparing an inquiry-based approach known as the science writing heuristic to traditional science teaching practices: Are there differences? International Journal of Science Education, 1, 1-21.
  • Artdej, R., Ratanaroutai, T., Coll, R. K., & Thongpanchang, T. (2010). Thai grade 11 students’ alternative conceptions for acid–base chemistry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(2), 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635141003748382
  • Aydeniz, M., Pabuççu, A., Çetin, P. S., & Kaya, E. (2012). Argumentation and Students’ conceptual understanding of properties and behaviors of gases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1303-1324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9336-1
  • Aydoğdu, B., Yıldız, E., Akpınar, E., & Ergin, Ö. (2006). İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Bilimsel Süreç Becerilerini Etkileyen Değişkenler. Eğitimde Çağdaş Yönelimler III Yapılandırmacılık Ve Eğitime Yansımaları Sempozyumu, 182-185.
  • Berland, L., & McNeill, K. L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765-793. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20402
  • Bradley. J. D., & Mosimege, M. D. (1998). Misconceptions in acids & bases: A comparative study of student teachers with different chemistry backgrounds. South African Journal of Chemistry, 51, 137-155.
  • Burke, K. A., Greenbowe, T. J., & Hand, B. M. (2005). Excerpts from the process of using inquiry and the science writing heuristic (Doctoral Dissertation). Prepared for the Middle Atlantic Discovery Chemistry Program, MoravianCollege, Bethlehem.
  • Çetin, P. S. (2014). Explicit argumentation instruction to facilitate conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.850071
  • Çetingül, P. İ., & Geban, Ö. (2005). Understanding of acid-Base concept by using conceptual change approach. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 29, 69-74.
  • Chang, C., & Weng, Y. (2000). Exploring interrelationship between problem-solving ability and science process skills of tenth-grade earth science students in Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 8(1), 35-56.
  • Cross, D., Taasoobshirazi, G., Hendricks, S., & Hickey, D., T. (2008). Argumentation: A strategy for improving achievement and revealing scientific identities. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 837-861. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701411567
  • Demirbağ, M., & Günel, M. (2014). Integrating argument-based science inquiry with modal representations: Impact on science achievement, argumentation, and writing skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 386-391. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.1.1632
  • Demircioğlu, G., Ayas, A., & Demicioğlu, H. (2005). Conceptual change achieved through a new teaching program on acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(1), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1039/B4RP90003K
  • Demircioğlu, G., Özmen, H., & Ayas, A. (2004). Some misconceptions encountered in chemistry: A research on acid and base. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 4(1), 73-80.
  • Driver, R. H., Asoko, J., Leach, E., Mortimer, P., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007005
  • Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
  • Duschl, R., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187
  • Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
  • Flores, G. S. (2000). Teaching and assessing science process skills in physics: The “Bubbles” task. Science Activities, 37(1), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368120009603556
  • Gultepe, N., & Kılıç, Z. (2015). Effect of scientific argumentation on the development of scientific process skills in the context of teaching chemistry. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(1), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1037/t51058-000
  • Jime´nez-Aleixandre, M.P., & Pereiro-Munhoz, C. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1171-1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210134857
  • Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “Doing science”: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
  • Kala, N., Yaman, F., & Ayas, A. (2013). The effectiveness of predict-observe-explain technique in probing students’ understanding about acid-base chemistry: A case forthe concepts of pH, pOH, and strenght. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 555-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9354-z
  • Karadeniz Bayrak, B. (2013). Using two-tier test to identify primary students’ conceptual understanding and alternative conceptions in acid base. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 3(2), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.13054/mije.13.21.3.2
  • Karpudewan, M., Roth, W., M., & Sinniah, D. (2016). The role of green chemistry activities in fostering secondary school students’ understanding of acid-base concepts and argumentation skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17, 893-901. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00079G
  • Kaya, E. (2013) Argumentation practices in classroom: Pre-service teachers’ conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1139-1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.770935
  • Kelly, G. J., Drucker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students’ reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 849-871. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200707
  • Keys, C. W. (2000). Investigating the thinking processes of eighth grade writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 37(7), 676-690. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<676::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-6
  • Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., Collins, S. 1999. Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10),1065-1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
  • Kılınç, A. (2014). İşbirlikli Öğrenme Yönteminin (Jigsaw Tekniği) Asitler ve Bazlar Konusunda Öğrenci Başarısına Etkisi ve Öğrenci Görüşleri (Masters Thesis). Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Ankara.
  • Kousathana, M., Demerouti, M., & Tsaparlis, G. (2005). Instructional misconceptions in ccid-base equilibria: An analysis from a history and philosophy of science perspective. Science & Education, 14, 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-5719-9
  • Lawson, A. E. (2003). The nature and development of hypothetico-predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1387-1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000052117
  • Leach, J. (1999). Students’ understanding of the co-ordination of theory and evidence in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 789-806. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290291
  • Mason, L. (1996). An analysis of children’s construction of new knowledge through their use of reasoning and arguing in classroom discussions. Qualitative Studies in Education, 9, 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839960090404
  • MEB (2018). Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı. Retrieved on 27 November 2018 from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812312311937-FEN%20BİLİMLERİ%20ÖĞRETİM%20PROGRAMI2018.pdf
  • Meriç G. (2014). Fen ve Teknoloji Dersinde Kavram Karikatürlerinin Öğrencilerin Kavramsal Anlama, Motivasyon ve Tutum Düzeyleri Üzerine Etkisi (Masters Thesis). Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Manisa.
  • Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 553-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290570
  • Nussbaum, M., & Sinatra, G. (2003). Argument and conceptual engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 384-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00038-3
  • Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
  • Patronis, T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students’ argumentation in decision-making on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 745-754. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290408
  • Ross. B. & Munby. H. (1991). Concept mapping and misconceptions: A study of high school students’ understanding of acids & bases. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130102
  • Sampson, V., & Walker, J., P. (2012). Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help undergraduate students write to learn by learning to write in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1443-1485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667581
  • Şaşmaz-Ören F., Tezcan R., 2009. İlköğretim 7. Sınıf Fen Bilgisi Dersinde Öğrenme Halkası Yaklaşımının Öğrencilerin Tutumları Üzerine Etkisi. Elementary Education Online, 8(1), 103-118.
  • Schafersman, S. D. (1991). An introduction to critical thinking. Retrieved from http://smartcollegeplanning.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Critical-Thinking.pdf
  • Schmidt, H. J. (1995). Applying the concept of conjugation to the Bronsted theory of acid–base reactions by senior high school students from Germany. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 733-742. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069950170605
  • Schwarz, B., Neumann, Y., Gil, J., & Ilya, M. (2003). Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 219-256. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_3
  • Sheppard, K. (2006). High school students’ understanding of titrations and related acid–base phenomena. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 7, 32-45. https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90014J
  • Suppe, F. (1998). The structure of a scientific paper. Philosophy of Science, 65, 381-405. https://doi.org/10.1086/392651
  • Tarhan, L., & Acar Sesen, B. (2012). Jigsaw cooperative learning: Acid–base theories. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP90004A
  • Turpin, T., & Cage, B. N. (2004). The effects of an integrated activity-based science curriculum on student achievement, science process skills and science attitudes. Electronic Journal of Literacy Through Science, 3, 1-15.
  • Tuysuz, C., Demirel, O., E., & Yildirim, B. (2013). Investigating the effects of argumentation, problem, and laboratory-based instruction approach on pre-service teachers’ achievement concerning the concept of “acid and base”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1376-1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.047
  • Von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to Learn and Learning to Argue: Case Studies of How Students’ Argumentation Relates to Their Scientific Knowledge Claudia von Aufschnaiter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20213
  • Yore, D. L. (2000). Enhancing science literacy for all students with embed reading instruction and writing to learn activities. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/5.1.105
  • Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of research in science teaching, 39(1), 35-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.