INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SCIENCE EDUCATION
Research Article

The Potential and Limitations of the Wadden Sea in University, School, and Out-Of-School Contexts From the Perspective of Biology Education

Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2022, 18(4), e2286, https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12072
Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study explores the potential and the limitations of the UNESCO World Heritage Wadden Sea in terms of its relevance for teacher training in higher education and for teaching in schools and as an out-of-school place of learning. Interviews with experts from these three areas were conducted. The analysis was performed through qualitative content analysis. Within this framework, various factors were identified that should be considered in further biology didactics studies. The findings indicate that out-of-school learning receives too little emphasis in teacher education and that the Wadden Sea offers opportunities to address this deficit. In addition, clear limits were set for school lessons on this ecosystem in contrast to practical explorations of the Wadden Sea. Nevertheless, incorporating Wadden Sea content in the classroom makes sense since diverse topics can be vividly explored. Out-of-school learning at the Wadden Sea was found to have an immense potential in education for sustainable development and in environmental education. One obstacle is the students’ reported disgust towards the Wadden Sea. Based on the results, conclusions are drawn for all three areas considered in this study, providing concrete implications for related studies with a focus on biological education on the Wadden Sea.

KEYWORDS

biology education Wadden Sea expert interview education for sustainable development environmental education

CITATION (APA)

Schmäing, T., & Grotjohann, N. (2022). The Potential and Limitations of the Wadden Sea in University, School, and Out-Of-School Contexts From the Perspective of Biology Education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2286. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12072
Harvard
Schmäing, T., and Grotjohann, N. (2022). The Potential and Limitations of the Wadden Sea in University, School, and Out-Of-School Contexts From the Perspective of Biology Education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2286. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12072
Vancouver
Schmäing T, Grotjohann N. The Potential and Limitations of the Wadden Sea in University, School, and Out-Of-School Contexts From the Perspective of Biology Education. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(4):e2286. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12072
AMA
Schmäing T, Grotjohann N. The Potential and Limitations of the Wadden Sea in University, School, and Out-Of-School Contexts From the Perspective of Biology Education. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(4), e2286. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12072
Chicago
Schmäing, Till, and Norbert Grotjohann. "The Potential and Limitations of the Wadden Sea in University, School, and Out-Of-School Contexts From the Perspective of Biology Education". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2022 18 no. 4 (2022): e2286. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12072
MLA
Schmäing, Till et al. "The Potential and Limitations of the Wadden Sea in University, School, and Out-Of-School Contexts From the Perspective of Biology Education". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 18, no. 4, 2022, e2286. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12072

REFERENCES

  1. Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429258589
  2. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.‑M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133-180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
  3. Bogner, A., & Menz, W. (2002a). Expertenwissen und Forschungspraxis: Die modernisierungstheoretische und die methodische Debatte um die Experten [Expert knowledge and research practice: The modernization-theoretical and the methodological debate about experts]. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Das experteninterview [The expert interview] (pp. 7-29). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93270-9_1
  4. Bogner, A., & Menz, W. (2002b). Das theoriegenerierende Experteninterview [The theory-generating expert interview]. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Das experteninterview [The expert interview] (pp. 33-70). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93270-9_2
  5. Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation: Für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler [Research methods and evaluation: For human and social scientists]. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33306-7
  6. Campbell, N. A., Urry, L. A., Cain, M. L., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., & Reece, J. B. (2020). Biology: A global approach, global edition. Pearson.
  7. Delbrück, M. (1976). How Aristotle discovered DNA. AIP Conference Proceedings, 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.30365
  8. Diersen, G., & Paschold, L. (2020). Außerschulisches Lernen–ein Beitrag zur Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung und Inklusion [Out-of-school learning–A contribution to education for sustainable development and inclusion]. ZEP–Zeitschrift für internationale Bildungsforschung und Entwicklungspädagogik, 2020(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.31244/zep.2020.01.03
  9. Döring, N., & Bortz, J. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften [Research methods and evaluation in the social and human sciences]. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5
  10. Flick, U. (2007). Qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Einführung [Qualitative social research: An introduction]. Rowohlt-Taschenbuch-Verlag.
  11. Föllinger, S. (2012). Aristotle’s biological works as scientific literature. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43(2), 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.12.025
  12. Gätje, C. (2004). Double strategy towards sustainable tourism: Offers for visitors and opportunities for people employed in tourism in the Wadden Sea National Park in Schleswig-Holstein. In T. Sievänen, J. Erkkonen, J. Jokimäki, J. Saarinen, S. Tuulentie, & E. Virtanen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas (pp. 330-335).
  13. Gebhard, U. (2020). Angst und Ekel vor Tieren [Fear and disgust of animals]. In U. Gebhard (Ed.), Kind und Natur [Child and nature] (pp. 213-240). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21276-6_11
  14. Giesel, K. D., Haan, G. de, & Rode, H. (2002). Umweltbildung in Deutschland [Environmental education in Germany]. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56368-3
  15. Goldberg, F., & Hildebrandt, A. (2020). Experteninterviews [Expert interviews]. In C. Wagemann, A. Goerres, & M. B. Siewert (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der Politikwissenschaft [Handbook of methods in political science] (pp. 267-284). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16936-7_17
  16. Gotthelf, A. (1999). Darwin on Aristotle. Journal of the History of Biology, 32(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004404206298
  17. Gropengießer, H. (2005). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse in der fachdidaktischen Lehr-Lernforschung [Qualitative content analysis in subject didactic teaching-learning research]. In P. Mayring, & M. Gläser-Zikuda (Eds.), UTB Pädagogik, Psychologie. Die Praxis der qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse [UTB pedagogy, psychology. The practice of qualitative content analysis] (pp. 172-189). Beltz.
  18. Großschedl, J., Mahler, D., Kleickmann, T., & Harms, U. (2014). Content-related knowledge of biology teachers from secondary schools: Structure and learning opportunities. International Journal of Science Education, 36(14), 2335-2366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.923949
  19. Helfferich, C. (2019). Leitfaden- und Experteninterviews [Guided and expert interviews]. In N. Baur, & J. Blasius (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung [Handbook of methods in empirical social research] (pp. 669-686). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_44
  20. Henry, D. (2006). Aristotle on the mechanism of inheritance. Journal of the History of Biology, 39(3), 425-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-005-3058-y
  21. Hesse, M. (2003). Nur geringes Wissen über Zellbiologie: Eine empirische Studie an Lehramtsstudenten [Limited knowledge of cell biology: An empirical study of student teachers]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Biologie–Biologie Lehren und Lernen [Journal for Didactics of Biology-Biology Teaching and Learning], 11(2002), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.4119/zdb-1685
  22. Hofstede, J. (2005). Danish–German–Dutch Wadden environments. In E. A. Koster (Ed.), The Oxford regional environments series 6. The physical geography of Western Europe (pp. 185-205). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199277759.003.0020
  23. Hofstede, J. L. A., & Stock, M. (2018). Climate change adaptation in the Schleswig-Holstein sector of the Wadden Sea: An integrated state governmental strategy. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 22(1), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-016-0433-0
  24. Kaiser, F. G., Roczen, N., & Bogner, F. X. (2008). Competence formation in environmental education: Advancing ecology-specific rather than general abilities. Umweltpsychologie [Environmental Psychology], 12(2), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-9249
  25. Krapp, A. (1992). Das Interessenkonstrukt. Bestimmungsmerkmale der Interessenhandlung und des individuellen Interesses aus der Sicht einer Person-Gegenstands-Konzeption [The interest construct. Determinants of the action of interest and individual interest from the point of view of a person-object conception]. In A. Krapp, & M. Prenzel (Eds.), Arbeiten zur sozialwissenschaftlichen Psychologie: Interesse, Lernen, Leistung: Neuere Ansätze der pädagogisch-psychologischen Interessenforschung [Works on social science psychology: Interest, learning, performance: Recent approaches to pedagogical-psychological interest research] (pp. 297-329). Aschendorff.
  26. Krüger, D., & Riemeier, T. (2014). Die qualitative Inhaltsanalyse–eine Methode zur Auswertung von Interviews [The qualitative content analysis–A method for the analysis of interviews]. In D. Krüger, I. Parchmann, & H. Schecker (Eds.), Methoden in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen Forschung [Methods in science didactic research] (pp. 133-145). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37827-0_11
  27. Kuckartz, U. (2016). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. Grundlagentexte Methoden [Qualitative content analysis: Methods, practice, computer support. Basic texts methods]. Beltz Juventa.
  28. Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2020). Fokussierte Interviewanalyse mit MAXQDA [Focused interview analysis with MAXQDA]. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31468-2
  29. Laursen, K., & Frikke, J. (2006). Assessment of sustainable management of staging waterbirds in the Danish Wadden Sea. Wildfowl, (56), 152-171.
  30. Lennox, J. G. (2006). Aristotle’s biology and Aristotle’s philosophy. In M. L. Gill (Ed.), Blackwell companions to philosophy: Bd. 31. A companion to ancient philosophy (pp. 292-315). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305845.ch16
  31. Liebold, R., & Trinczek, R. (2009). Experteninterview [Expert interview]. In S. Kühl, P. Strodtholz, & A. Taffertshofer (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der Organisationsforschung [Handbook of organizational research methods] (pp. 32-56). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91570-8_3
  32. Loosen, W. (2016). Das Leitfadeninterview–eine unterschätzte Methode [The guided interview–An underestimated method]. In S. Averbeck-Lietz, & M. Meyen (Eds.), Handbuch nicht standardisierte Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft [Handbook of non-standard methods in communication science] (pp. 139-155). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01656-2_9
  33. Mahler, D., Großschedl, J., & Harms, U. (2017a). Opportunities to learn for teachers’ self-efficacy and enthusiasm. Education Research International, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4698371
  34. Mahler, D., Großschedl, J., & Harms, U. (2017b). Using doubly latent multilevel analysis to elucidate relationships between science teachers’ professional knowledge and students’ performance. International Journal of Science Education, 39(2), 213-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1276641
  35. Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis: Basics and techniques]. Beltz.
  36. Meuser, M., & Nagel, U. (1991). ExpertInneninterviews–vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht: Ein Beitrag zur qualitativen Methodendiskussion [Expert interviews–much tried, little considered: A contribution to the qualitative method discussion]. In D. Garz, & K. Kraimer (Eds.), Qualitativ-empirische Sozialforschung [Qualitative-empirical social research] (pp. 441-471). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97024-4_14
  37. Meuser, M., & Nagel, U. (2009). Das Experteninterview–konzeptionelle Grundlagen und methodische Anlage [The expert interview–conceptual principles and methodological appendix]. In S. Pickel, G. Pickel, H.-J. Lauth, & D. Jahn (Eds.), Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft [Methods of comparative political and social science] (pp. 465-479). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91826-6_23
  38. Ministerium für Schule und Weiterbildung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. (1997). Richtlinien für Schulfahrten [School trip guidelines]. https://bass.schul-welt.de/288.htm
  39. Ministerium für Schule und Weiterbildung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. (2012). Praxiselemente in den lehramtsbezogenen Studiengängen [Practicum elements in teaching-related degree programs]. https://bass.schul-welt.de/12448.htm
  40. Ministerium für Schule und Weiterbildung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. (2014). Kernlehrplan für die Sekundarstufe II Gymnasium/Gesamtschule in Nordrhein-Westfalen Biologie [Curriculum for the secondary level II Gymnasium/Gesamtschule in North Rhine-Westphalia biology]. https://www.schulentwicklung.nrw.de/lehrplaene/upload/klp_SII/bi/GOSt_Biologie_Endfassung.pdf
  41. Ministerium für Schule und Weiterbildung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. (2019). Kernlehrplan für die Sekundarstufe I Gymnasium in Nordrhein-Westfalen Biologie [Curriculum for the secondary level I Gymnasium in North Rhine-Westphalia biology]. https://www.schulentwicklung.nrw.de/lehrplaene/lehrplan/197/g9_bi_klp_%203413_2019_06_23.pdf
  42. Mrazek, J., Siegmund, A., Fischer, C. & Aeschbach, N. (2018). “Nachhaltigkeit lehren lernen”–Innovative interdisziplinäre Lehr-Lern-Formate in der Lehramtsausbildung an Pädagogischer Hochschule und Universität Heidelberg [“Learning to teach sustainability” –Innovative interdisciplinary teaching-learning formats in teacher training at Heidelberg University of Education and Heidelberg University]. In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Theorie und Praxis der Nachhaltigkeit. Nachhaltigkeit in der Lehre [Theory and practice of sustainability. sustainability in teaching] (pp. 327-347). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56386-1_20
  43. Müller, N., & Elster, D. (2018). Promoting teacher students’ system competence by the development of a syndrome approach in an interdisciplinary seminar. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference on the New Perspectives in Science Education (pp. 284-289). Florence, Italy.
  44. Nationalparkverwaltung Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer. (2017). Bildungskonzept der Nationalparkeinrichtungen [Educational concept of the national park institutions]. https://www.cuxhaven.de/_Resources/Persistent/a/c/4/5/ac451889ce34c1170c02ee78f0d63e8cb38db445/Umweltbildungskonzept_der_NLPE___2017.11.08.__.pdf
  45. Nehring, S., & Hesse, K.‑J. (2008). Invasive alien plants in marine protected areas: The Spartina anglica affair in the European Wadden Sea. Biological Invasions, 10(6), 937-950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9244-z
  46. Polte, S., & Wilde, M. (2018). Wirkt Ekel vor lebenden Tieren bei Schülerinnen und Schülern als Prädiktor für ihr Flow-Erleben? [Does disgust of living animals come into effect as a predictor of students’ flow-experience?] Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften [Journal of Science Education], 24(1), 287-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-018-0075-x
  47. Preisfeld, A. (2019). Die Bedeutung der Fachlichkeit in der Lehramtsausbildung in Biologie–Die Vernetzung universitären Fachwissens mit schulischen Anforderungen im Praxissemester [The importance of subject matter in teacher education in biology–The interconnectedness of university subject matter knowledge with school requirements in the internship semester]. In M. Degeling (Ed.), Herausforderung Kohärenz: Praxisphasen in der universitären Lehrerbildung: Bildungswissenschaftliche und fachdidaktische Perspektiven [The challenge of coherence: Practical phases in university teacher training: Educational and didactic perspectives] (pp. 97-120). Verlag Julius Klinkhardt.
  48. Przyborski, A., & Wohlrab-Sahr, M. (2014). Qualitative Sozialforschung [Qualitative social research]. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486719550
  49. Rädiker, S., & Kuckartz, U. (2019). Analyse qualitativer Daten mit MAXQDA [Analysis of qualitative data with MAXQDA]. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22095-2
  50. Rösner, H.‑U. (2018). The Wadden Sea: A natural landscape outside the dikes. In L. Egberts, & M. Schroor (Eds.), Waddenland outstanding (pp. 81-94). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048537884-006
  51. Rupprecht, F., Wanner, A., Stock, M., & Jensen, K. (2015). Succession in salt marshes–large-scale and long-term patterns after abandonment of grazing and drainage. Applied Vegetation Science, 18(1), 86-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12126
  52. Rust, H. (1980). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse–begriffslose Willkür oder wissenschaftliche Methode? Ein theoretischer Entwurf [Qualitative content analysis–Conceptless arbitrariness or scientific method? A theoretical outline]. Publizistik [Journalism], 25(3), 5-23.
  53. Rust, H. (1981). Methoden und Probleme der Inhaltsanalyse. Eine Einführung [Methods and problems of content analysis. An introduction]. Narr.
  54. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
  55. Scheersoi, A., Bögeholz, S., & Hammann, M. (2019). Biologiedidaktische Interessenforschung: Empirische Befunde und Ansatzpunkte für die Praxis [Didactic interest research in biology: Empirical findings and starting points for practice]. In J. Groß, M. Hammann, P. Schmiemann, & J. Zabel (Ed.), Biologiedidaktische Forschung: Erträge für die Praxis [Didactic research in biology: Income for practice] (pp. 37-55). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58443-9_3
  56. Schiefele, H., Prenzel, M., Krapp, A., Heiland, A., & Kasten, H. (1983). Zur Konzeption einer pädagogischen Theorie des Interesses [On the conception of a pedagogical theory of interest]. Gelbe Reihe, Arbeiten zur Empirischen Pädagogik und Pädagogischen Psychologie [Yellow Series, Works on Empirical Pedagogy and Educational Psychology], (6).
  57. Schmäing, T., & Grotjohann, N. (2021a). Students’ Word Associations with Different Terms Related to the Wadden Sea: Does the Place of Residence (Coast or Inland) Have an Influence? Education Sciences, 11(6), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060284
  58. Schmäing, T., & Grotjohann, N. (2021b). The Wadden Sea as a National Park and UNESCO World Heritage Site: Students’ Word Associations with These Two Conservation Designations. Sustainability, 13(14), 8006. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148006
  59. Schmidt, C. (2017). Analyse von Leitfadeninterviews [Analysis of guided interviews]. In U. Flick (Ed.), Rororo Rowohlts Enzyklopädie: Bd. 55628. Qualitative Forschung: Ein Handbuch [Rororo Rowohlt’s Encyclopedia: Vol. 55628. Qualitative research: A handbook] (pp. 447-456). Rowohlt-Taschenbuch-Verlag.
  60. Schultz, W. P. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In P. Schmuck, & W. P. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61-78). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4
  61. Sellmann, D. (2011). Umweltbildung zum Thema Klimawandel im botanischen Garten: Wissen, Einstellungen und Konzepte von Jugendlichen [Environmental education on climate change in botanical gardens: Knowledge, attitudes and concepts of young people] [PhD dissertation, Universität Bayreuth].
  62. Sellmann, D. (2014). Environmental education on climate change in a botanical garden: Adolescents’ knowledge, attitudes and conceptions. Environmental Education Research, 20(2), 286-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.870130
  63. The World Heritage Committee. (2009). Report of decisions: Extract of the report agenda item 8B–Nominations to the world heritage list decision 33 COM 8B.4. https://whc.unesco.org/archive/2009/whc09-33com-20e.pdf
  64. The World Heritage Committee. (2014). Decisions adopted. https://whc.unesco.org/archive/2014/whc14-38com-16en.pdf
  65. Vinci, T., & Robert, J. S. (2005). Aristotle and modern genetics. Journal of the History of Ideas, 66(2), 201-221. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2005.0041
  66. Wilde, M., & Bätz, K. (2010). Sind die süüüß!: Der Einfluss des unterrichtlichen Einsatzes lebender Zwergmäuse auf Wissenserwerb, Motivation und Haltungswunsch [Are they cuuute!: The influence of the use of live dwarf mice in class on knowledge acquisition, motivation and desire to keep them]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Biologie (ZDB)-Biologie Lehren und Lernen [Journal for didactics of biology (ZDB)-Biology teaching and learning], 17(2009). https://doi.org/10.4119/zdb-1647

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.